Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
sorry,
I spoke about functoids, because I tried do do that from the mapper!
But I think that you did it from the orchestration, isn’t it ??
Should I have 2 ports?? One for the test, and the second one for the request ??
Thanks
A.C.Hi Mr. Stephen M. Thomas,
I have a small question:
Now I have to configure my functoid, but for me it’s the first time, and I would like to ask you if you have any examples or availables links about the scripts!
You told me that you have already done a script !
I’m searching on the Internet if I find something!Thank you in advance
A.C.looking at the HAT tells me the schema is not deployed. However, the flat file version works so the schema IS deployed. Do I need to produce new schemas when exposing a port as a web service? I think this isn’t the problem though.
You might want to check this out: http://support.microsoft.com/?scid=kb;en-us;836119
But it really doesn’t tell you how to get the download.
The help guide says:
Problem: Health and Activity Tracking (HAT) fails with the following error if you do not properly install Microsoft Office XP Tool: Web Controls (OWC10):
ActiveView.ColumnAxis is not null or not an objectResolution: Type the following line at the command prompt:
regsvr32 \”C:\\Program Files\\Common Files\\Microsoft Shared\\Web Components\\10\\OWC10.DLLBest of luck
I think that is a permission problem.
Make sure the user you are running under is a member of the SSO Admin group and BizTalk Server Admin group.
If that is not the problem, make sure your Enterprise Single Sign On is running.
If that still does not work, them you’ll have to check the RPC settings on both computers.
But, I think one of the first two suggestions will work.
Sorry, I have not heard any additional information on this.
As far as I know, you still need Covast to get all the EDI documents.
But that could be wrong or change.
Just a few things I can think of that might cause this problem are the permissions of the Application Pool or IIS user (needs to be in Biztalk Application Users group), the receiving host service is not started, or some the schema is not deployed.
Let me know if any of these work for you.
The only thing I might think to try is rather then using BizTalk HTTP Adapter for your call try using a .net component call inside an Orchestration.
That would reduce all the Adapter and Message Box overhead. Just make sure you know the cost of this in terms of loss of message tracking, batching, and potential reliability.
I don’t know how this would perform when compared to the adapter but I would be curios to get your thoughts on this and find out how it works.
I would think it would be faster but not scale as well.
What I have done in the past is just use a .net componet that is called by an Orchestation. It just used System.Data.OracleClient. First it checked if the record existed. Then, it did either an update or an insert. In total, it was about 40 lines of code.
It worked well if you didn’t want to get an Oracle Adapter and were not under a high load.
The Called and Start Orchestration shape are pure message box / direct port routing solutions. They will bypass the receive adapters and pipelines.
If you needed a pipeline to be called, you might want to look at write out to a MSMQ queue or someone had a lookback adapter. I think it was on gotdotnet.
Are you using a BizTalk map for your transformation?
If not, I don’t think I can help you out much.
I did have somewhat of a similar probably with encoding but I think I corrected it by using a text string rather then the byte sting I was using. Probably not too relevant to what you are doing.
I have not worked with delimited attributes. I think they have some funny rules, like you can only have one and it has to be the first item in the record.
Would Elements work for you?
Although, your error message is somewhat misleading. It says you do not have a matching subscription. But, I’m guessing that’s due to the disassembler parsing the message incorrectly?
Since BizTalk creates the web ports for you with schemas I would think it would be difficult to call web services dynamically inside an Orchestration.
Doing this, do you still need to have a web reference to the web service?
I’m curious how this ends up working for you.
Sure, that would be useful.
If you wanted to email me (you can find my email on the Contact page) what you have (make sure it is doesn’t contain any client / sensitive info) I can clean it up and do a little write up on it. Then, I can get it posted to this site.
Or, you can post directly to gotdotnet.com if you wish. Just post the link here so people can find it.
Thanks.
