community-content

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 8,776 through 8,790 (of 9,652 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Problem: The Messaging Engine failed to add a receive URL #13118

    The error indicates a problem in the Xml Receive pipeline. This pipeline has two components XmlDisassembler and PartyResolver.

    My guess is a problem with the XmlDisassembler, and a problem with the message.

    Can you dump out the XmlDoc into a log file to see what is being passed into Biztalk.

    Do you restart the Biztalk Service after every change to the Biztalk config, or deployment. Sometimes assembly mismatches cause strange errors.

    Why do you not publish the Orchestration as a web service using the wizard?

    in reply to: Problem: The Messaging Engine failed to add a receive URL #13114

    Hi Greg,

    Thanks for the quick reply. The error didn’t appear already.

    However I got a new error.

    Basically, I created a webservice that consumes the Biztalk Orchestration. This webservice uses SubmitRequest.dll.

    This is the code that has this source of code.

    XmlDocument xmlResult = SubmitRequest.ProcessMessage(xmlDoc);

    *SubmitRequest functions the same as the SubmitRequest in SDK except that it is a dll now and not a console-application.

    Again, I tried it on XP and it works. But when I put it in Windows Server 2003. it gives me this error

    \”There was a failure executing the receive pipeline: \”Microsoft.BizTalk.DefaultPipelines.XMLReceive\” Source: \”Microsoft.BizTalk.Messaging\” Receive Location: \”Submit://ProcessRequest\” Reason: Specified cast is not valid.\”

    I found this…http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=910295 but it seems that it is not same issue since I didn’t expose my Orchestration as web service, instead I used a web service that calls my orchestration through the submit adapter.

    Please help me.

    Thank you very much in advance.

    in reply to: Problem: The Messaging Engine failed to add a receive URL #13117

    80131014 is a COM error, cant find IUnknown.
    This tends to indicate the adapter hasn’t been register properly

    Check this registry key:
    HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\\CLSID\\{CFD15534-83BB-4a13-9F82-50F51E200E04}

    Does it exist, if so do the subkeys and values match those set in RegisterAdapter.cs of the TransportProxyUtilsReg project

    Try running:
    TransportProxyUtilsReg\\bin\\Debug\\RegisterAdapter.exe /u
    and
    TransportProxyUtilsReg\\bin\\Debug\\RegisterAdapter.exe

    in reply to: biztalk 2004 and informix #13109

    There are some example adapters for ODBC and OLEDB

    [url]http://www.gotdotnet.com/workspaces/workspace.aspx?id=4669f9cf-1eb9-4891-ba35-76ea42e45de4[/url]

    [url]http://www.gotdotnet.com/Community/UserSamples/Details.aspx?SampleGuid=2F88D1C8-BD76-4A1D-B55B-C5FF80B7D3C4[/url]

    [url]http://www.gotdotnet.com/Community/UserSamples/Details.aspx?SampleGuid=34AFD307-2347-43CF-BDC6-33C8428B4E6D[/url]

    If none of these suit then you could write your own custom adapter

    in reply to: Getting two XSD,While Generating XML file #13111

    Hi All

    While Generating XSD from a XML file by using ADD Generating Items Window(WellFormed-XML), I am getting two XSD’s in my Biztalk Editor Window, EX: \”EMP.XSD\”,\”EMP1.XSD\”. In \”EMP.XSD\” i am not getting the Root Element. Coming to the \”EMP1.XSD\” I am getting all the elements.If I drop the \”EMP.XSD\” from my Solution Explorer, I am getting boubt when i am going to map schemes in my MapEditor, while Importing the Source and Destination Schemas in MapEditor, I am getting Rootnode and elements of that rootnode,but not any other records & fields.Why I am getting this problem, is it necessary to save these two XSD’s in my Solution Explorer. And While Generating why we are getting two \”.XSD’S\”

    in reply to: BizTalk vs SAP #13078

    No I don’t. I don’t use SAP in the project.

    Can you provide me with any websites that talks about such comparison.

    Am evaluating BizTalking software as well, are there any helpful links to evaluate BizTalk i.e. the dark side of BizTalk, when is BizTalk so helpful and when it is not and so on.

    Your concern will be highly appreciated.

    in reply to: Content-based Routing #13068

    Thanks for the reply greg.forsythe!

    in reply to: Biztalk configuration problem #13104

    Biztalk access the SQL database using Windows Authentication. When you install both SQL and Biztalk on one machine this is not a problem as you can use local users and groups. In fact Biztalk will create the required users and groups for.

    When installing SQL on a remote machine you need to have users and groups that can be used on both machines. Local users are only valid on the local machine.
    The standard in this circumstance is to add the required users and groups to a domain and use the domain account when configuring Biztalk.

    If you do not have a domain, then there is a workaround but it is messy.
    You need to add exactly the same users and groups to both machine, i.e. both the user name and password must be the same. If a password is changed on one machine it must be changed on the other.

    in reply to: Biztalk configuration problem #13103

    Rajiv,

    You can install BTS2004 on Windows 2000 Prof…i did many times.

    I never got this type error, i remember i got some database errors which i resolved changing some information in the registry…

    hope this article helps you..

    http://geekswithblogs.net/mhamilton/archive/2005/05/01/38784.aspx

    Nar-

    [

    quote=\”Rajiv \”]Hi,

    I have installed biztalk server 2004 on windows 2000 professional
    machine which is having local sql server 2000 client.
    The sql server 2000 database resides on another wondows 2003 server machine.

    When i am configuring biztalk server on my local machine(through configframework), it gives me following error

    Failed to create SQL login for biztalk administrators group on database server \”RemoteWindows2003ServerName\”.
    Windows Nt user or group ‘RemoteWindows2003ServerName\\Biztalk server administrators’ not found.Check the name again.

    I have already created this group on my local machine and assigned administrator user to it(Do i need to create these users manuallly).

    Do i need to create this and other groups on Windows 2003 server(Where the sql server database resides) as well ?

    IS this a group or a user is not clear to me. i created it as a group because biztalk configuration allows only groups name to be edited.
    If yes, please let me know the procedure.
    Note: I also added tried domain name to the user/group but it is alos of no use.

    Early help on this is highly solicited.

    regards
    rajiv[/quote]

    No Rajeev we cann’t install BizTalk Server on WIndows 2000 Professional. we can only install it on Windows XP or Windows 2003

    Is this one of those \”supposed-to-be-exams-that-never-happened\”?

    in reply to: Biztalk workflow wih .net #13064

    I would suggest starting with one of the samples from the SDK
    You may need the SDK Refresh
    [url]http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=8A1CA3AF-790C-4261-838A-9F0661C72887&displaylang=en[/url]

    Pick a simple one like CBRSample (content based routing) in the Samples/Messaging folder.

    For more advanced samples check out the Tutorials
    [url]http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=9C64562C-3FA7-49BA-885E-82213D00776E&displaylang=en[/url]

    Feel free to post any specific queries, if you have trouble with these samples

    in reply to: SampleEnvelopes #13093

    The no matching subscription means no orchestration or send port has subscribed to the message being published by the receive port.

    There could be a number of reasons for this.

    Are you using a Send Port or orchestration to process the incoming message/s

    If you are using a send port what filters have you set.

    If using an orchestration
    [list:bc1cb8dd4d]Is it bound to the receive port
    Has the orchestration been enlisted and started
    What is the message type being received by the orchestration is it an envelope or message[/list:u:bc1cb8dd4d]

    in reply to: Biztalk installation(sql server service pack) #13096

    You can also upgrage all SQL components to SP 4

    in reply to: Basic Biztalk questions #13074

    An application can be almost anything you decide.
    In the case of your invoice example I would group all invoice related interchanges into one application. So the inbound 850 + response 997 + passing the invoice to an internal application + potentially matching against the purchasing system….

    You can deploy everything into one application if you wish, i.e. invoicing, purchase orders, integrating the CRM and Financials system, etc Although you would soon regret this as management would become very difficult.

    And yes you pay by processor (although a hyperthreading CPU counts as 1)

Viewing 15 posts - 8,776 through 8,790 (of 9,652 total)