[community-content]

I have the host set to authenticated trusted in BTA hosts. Is that the same as trusted host? Or is there somewhere else where the host is set to trusted?

[community-content]

OK, I haven’t fixed it yet, but I’m close. The initial problem I had was a typo in the namespace of the property schema. This caused BizTalk to not send the SOAP header. Now that I’ve corrected the typo, I am getting better error messages.

If the WSDL file declares a SOAP header as only mixed=\”true\”, what data type should I use in the property schema? I initially tried xs:string, but I received the error attached below.

—————- WSDL excerpts —————-

<s:element name=\”user\” type=\”tns:user\” />
<s:complexType name=\”user\” mixed=\”true\” />

<wsdl:message name=\”Createuser\”>
<wsdl:part name=\”user\” element=\”tns:user\” />
</wsdl:message>

<wsdl:input>
<soap:body use=\”literal\” />
<soap:header message=\”tns:Createuser\” part=\”user\” use=\”literal\” />
</wsdl:input>

—————-Error ——————–

Details:\”Failed to initialize the SOAP header field or property \”userValue\”. Details: \”System.InvalidOperationExceptionThere is an error in XML document (1, 1).\”.
Possible reasons are:
1) MemberName property of System.Web.Services.Protocol.SoapHeaderAttribute does not map to a field or property in the type.
2) The message context property value associated with the header cannot be converted to the target header type.
3) The target field or property is read-only or cannot be modified. \”.

[community-content]

Steve

Yes the 2003 machine has BizTalk SP1 (as well as 2003 SP1) – the XP machines have BizTalk SP1 as well.

All 3 messages have namespaces declared

Regards

[community-content]

When you check it on Windows 2003 – does that have SP1 for Biztalk installed? I think SP1 changed some namespace requirements that might affect this.

As far as a workaround, I think it is important to have a namespace on each of the messages you are using as input and output of the transformation. Do they already have namespaces?

[community-content]

Do you have your Orchestration set up to send the correct message back?

You might want to check that – make sure it returns what you are expecting. Typically, you would set up a request / response to handle this.

Hope this helps.

[community-content]

I think that reg setting might be needed as well.

Something seems to be blocking it. You might want to also make sure you go to have any firewalls that might be blocking it.

Other then changing the DTC setting on each computer, I do not know anything else to try.

[community-content]

I have the following systems:
1. Biztalk 2004 Server installed on a Windows 2003 Server
2. BizTalk 2004 and Visual Stusdo.Net installed on a Windows XP (development)
3. SQL Server installed on a Windows 2000 Server

I went through your steps and the accounts and MTC is good.

I also saw a post about setting the registry: [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\\SOFTWARE\\Policies\\Microsoft\\Windows NT\\RPC]
\”EnableAuthEpResolution\”=dword:00000001. What so you know about that?

The error happens when I try to deploy from system 2 to system 3.

I haven’t done aything with SSO. On what systems and how do I configure that?

Thanks

[community-content]

I needed to publish an instance of the dateTime object via the IFactCreator. So even a DateTime.Now requires an instance for the BRE.

In the BRE Composer the IFactCreator does the work to instantiate the consumed .Net object. In the Orchestration, you pass instances in as parameters and don’t need the IFactCreator.

[community-content]

💡
Hi to all,
i’m working about a simple flow with BTS04 that receive an IDOC from SAP enviroment.
I have maked a simple Receive Location that is binding from a SAP enviroment. This Receive Location
is in binding with a Send Port with the filter BTS.ReceivePortName == <Name of Receive Port Location>.
I have tested the comunication between all system and it’s good. When i send an IDOC from SAP
there is the error message:
\”The Messaging engine failed to process a message submitted by adapter:SAP Source URL:sap://KDPLB99:SRVSAP05/SVILUPPO/sapgw00/.
Details:Could not find a matching subscription for the message. .
This error occurs if the subscribed orchestration schedule or send port has not been started,
or if some of the message properties necessary for subscription evaluation have not been promoted.
Please refer to Health and Activity Tracking tool for more detailed information on this failure\”

I have check inside the HAT and appeare the next error message:

\”Routing failure report\”

Where is the error?

Thanks a lot
[color=blue:71be419631][/color:71be419631]

[community-content]

We have two incoming messages to an Orchestration. Data from both of these messages are to be used to construct another message which will be sent to an external system.

Of the two incoming messages, one is fairly simple with a mix of records and elements, the other is complex, built up of a number of extended types from schema dictionaries.

Using Windows XP SP2 workstations with .Net 2003, BizTalk developer tools etc installed (all have .Net 1.1 SP 1, BizTalk 2004 SP1 and one has the BizTalk rollup), the complex schema does not display properly in the source pane of the mapping tool when this is part of a two-message input via the Transform shape.

What seems to be happening is that any element declared on the base data type in the schema is missing, while properties on the extended type are OK. If the map is changed to only input the one, complex schema, everything displays correctly.

Also, a colleague running Windows 2003 Server with Visual Studio and BizTalk has tried this, and on that environment, the complex schema displays correctly when part of a two message mapping source.

It would appear as if the Server 2003 environment has a BizTalk, Studio or .Net Framework patch that we do not have on the XP environments, however all that we have examined suggests that we do in fact have all the same service pack, framework patch levels etc.

The following screen captures illustrate what we are seeing when we have the two message input on XP:

[img:158574d987]http://www.eveleigh.f9.co.uk/images2/fig1.jpg[/img:158574d987]

The \”FMAApplication\” record shows a single sequence containing four records, the first of which contains two fields. What it should look like (if the map is changed to have just the complex schema in place) is as follows:

[img:158574d987]http://www.eveleigh.f9.co.uk/images2/fig2.jpg[/img:158574d987]

As you can see, there are far more sequence groups, records and fields in the full Schema!

For info, the transformation shape in the Orchestration is being configured as follows:

Source transform:
[img:158574d987]http://www.eveleigh.f9.co.uk/images2/fig3.jpg[/img:158574d987]

Destination transform:
[img:158574d987]http://www.eveleigh.f9.co.uk/images2/fig4.jpg[/img:158574d987]

Any thoughts or suggestions as to what fixes/patches we may be missing, or configuration we may have missed to resolve this would be really appreciated.

[community-content]

hai friends,
I want to extract values from positional file.
Database functiod value extractor works with SQL server and it extracts value from a table.Like extracting values from database i want to extract from a positional file.
Is there any functiod which ressembles like database fonctiod value extractor to extract values from positional file.

can anybody help me?
Thanks in advance

[community-content]

Hi Stephen,

Thanks for the reply. I have sorted the problem but now facing a new problem. When i call the orchestration which in turns calls a webservice, i do not get the result back. I get what i have sent to the orchestration.

Any ideas ???

Thanks,

Nagul

[community-content]

Did you use the wizard to expose the Orchestration as a web service?

I do not remember seeing a 415 error before

[community-content]

I do not have many ideas on this one.

I have seen at least one KB’s on this (http://support.microsoft.com/?id=835870) but you have probably already looked at it.

You are using a trusted host right? I think it has to be trusted.

That is about all I know about it. Best of luck.

[community-content]

That is very hard to do with Biztalk 2004. I have tried to do exactly what you wanted with no luck.

You might want to try writing the flat file to the file system. Then, having another process picks it up using the pass through pipeline. Then, receive it as a message of type XmlDocument (it works – kind of strange through) and then pass that to the web service.

You can do this in 2006 – but that doesn’t help you now.

[Author]

Posts