community-content

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 9,376 through 9,390 (of 9,652 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: deploy et undeploy #12263

    hai caroline,
    You don’t need to re-create your send and receive ports.

    Step 1:
    When you want to undeploy a assembly, you just supprime the name of maps in send and receive ports .

    Step 2:
    Undeploy the assembly(Now it will undeploy the assembly successfully)

    Step 3:
    If you want to redeploy it,Change the version of your biztalk project as 1.0.0.1 and deploy.

    Step 4:
    Add the name of map in the already existing send and receive ports and test.

    I hope this helps you.If want further details write me again

    in reply to: deploy et undeploy #12257

    I am having what I think to be the same problem. When I try to redeploy a project it will not let me as it gives me the error message
    \”Some items in the removed assembly are still being used…\”. To get past this I have to then delete my receive port and location, deploy and then add the receive location and port again. I have checked my assembly version and it is 1.0.0.0. Is there anyway around this problem or do I have to continue recreating my receive port every time?

    in reply to: How to specify input location dynamically? #12380

    In last reply of input location dynamically you have mentioned [b:69c4b742ed]Queue[/b:69c4b742ed].

    So actually what is meant by queue?

    Is it a [b:69c4b742ed]Message Queue [/b:69c4b742ed]of computer?

    in reply to: How to specify input location dynamically? #12379

    I have to call web service through biztalk orchestration without passing parameter to it.
    Is it possible to call web service through orchestration without sending parameters.

    And if my web service consists of different function then how can i called only specific function through orchestration?

    Thanks in advance

    in reply to: message.parameters ????? #12360

    Hi Mr. Stephen W. Thomas,

    thank you for your reply!

    Today I’ll try your solution and I’ll give you my feedback!

    regards
    A.C.

    in reply to: BizTalk Direct Binding using Message Queue (Any sample?) #12351

    Oh, I think that might be your problem. Biztalk wants a unique set of Message Type Names (that is Namespace#Root Node Name). If not, you have to take additional action in your Pipelines.

    So, if you namespace and root node name are exactly the same you might want to try removing one of them.

    in reply to: BizTalk Direct Binding using Message Queue (Any sample?) #12349

    Thanks Stephen.

    I have figured out the way to use (Direct binding) – however with some hiccups (the issue you mentioned above)

    1) I had two projects, one each for source and destination(consuming) orchestration. Both the projects included the same schema (with the same namespace, except that first one is creating the document and the second one is consuming it). However, it does not work. I get \”no orch. is subscribing\” error. Out of curiousity, I created one big project with both the orch. included (since, same namespace makes sense) and it worked. I will be interested to know how the namespace will look like if I have both the orch. in separate projects. I used subscription viewer utility, but could not figure it what I am doing wrong.

    I will look forward to your sample. Hopefully, you will create it as 2 separate projects.

    Thanks again. You are doing a wonderful job.

    Ken

    in reply to: install on Win2k – Q828748… updates? #12387

    Well, I for one have not tried to install BizTalk on Windows 2000. I have a hard enough time getting installed on XP 😀 .

    I could not find any information on those as well. In fact, the link on the BizTalk 2004 page on the Microsoft site was actually broken 👿 .

    It is possible these were corrected in later service packs? Just a guess.

    If it makes you feel any better, BizTalk 2006 is SO much easier to install.

    Best of luck.

    in reply to: Large Flat File Problem #12384

    You might be hitting a timeout in IIS, the adapter, or in your call. I’d check IIS first.

    Just a thought.

    in reply to: message.parameters ????? #12362

    Well, in your case you can not easily promote that property.

    You have a few options:
    – Change the schema so it is only 1 to 1. Do not know if this is even an option or if it will break the adapter
    – Write a custom pipeline component to promote it
    – Use XPath inside your Orchestation (probably the easiest)

    You can find samples of this here:
    [url]http://www.biztalkgurus.com/Samples/XPath-Inside-Orchestration.html[/url]

    in reply to: How to specify input location dynamically? #12381

    As far as I know you have to do a timing type polling if you want to use the SQL Adapter. You can, of course, build your own adapter or get the record into Biztalk through some other method – like having triggers write message to a queue.

    As far as dynamic input, as far as I know that is not possible. Receives into Biztalk through the SQL Adapter have to be known locations since it works on a polling bases.

    Hope this helps.

    in reply to: deploy et undeploy #12260

    The Biztalk project versions are set in the project file. Right click on the project, go to Properties. Under Common Properties – Assembly. The Assembly Version is right there.

    Hope this helps.

    in reply to: Listen shape problem #12366

    Stephen

    I have a listen shape with multiple branches and each branch has a receive shape with Activate=true. I had only one port with multiple operations. Each operation denoting a web method. What was happening was that whenever I call any method it always went to the first brach.

    One other thing to note is that my messages are of type .NET classes. Most messages look the same…….. (ie) they are of the same type. Thus I needed a way to differentiate them, so I used this circumvention to distinguish them and route them to the appropriate branch in the listen shape based on which web method was called.

    It works.

    in reply to: Listen shape problem #12365

    Stephen

    The problem with my messages are that they are of type .NET classes. Most messages look the same…….. (ie) they are aof the same type. This I needed a way to differentiate them, so I used this circumvention to distinguish them and route them to the appropriate branch in the listen shape.

    It works.

    in reply to: Listen shape problem #12364

    This is what I did.

    I created a schema in my biztalk project. I then promoted some of the properties. In my case,

    HeaderSchema.xsd where I had promoted MessageType and EventType.

    Then I created multipart messages for each of the incoming branches’ receive shape and added this schema to be one of the parts, besides the actual message that I will be receiving in that receive shape.

    Then, in the receive shape I added filter expression, where I said MessageType==\”something1\” AND EventType==\”something2\” for receive shape in the first branch and, MessageType==\”something3\” AND EventType==\”something4\” for receive shape in the second branch and so on for each branch’s receive shape.

    You can then publish the orchestration as a web service and then while calling the webmethod add another paramter, which is of type header schema and enter your values there. For the first method (branch 1) set the property values of the header schema object to be MessageType==\”something1\” and EventType==\”something2\”, then set this value for each and every web method call. This way the listen shape will know which branch to forward it to based on the filter specified in the receive shape.

    Hope that helps. I know this is not the greatest way to do this, however with the limitations in documentation and help from microsoft on this sucker \”BizTalk\” this is all we could come up with.

Viewing 15 posts - 9,376 through 9,390 (of 9,652 total)