Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Hi Mr. Neal Walters,
I’ve tried catching a SOAPException, but nothing occurs.
Maybe I’m missing something, In the catch block, I have an expression shape with the following code:[code:1:895a6fe256]System.Diagnostics.EventLog.WriteEntry(\"SQL\", \"Se produjo un error en SQL Server\", System.Diagnostics.EventLogEntryType.Error);[/code:1:895a6fe256]
Then in my sp, I insert a duplicate key so an error occurs, but my orchestration doesn’t log any error in the event viewer.
Can you help me, please? 😀
Saludos. Mauricio.
Buenos Aires – Argentina
Thanks–I was planning to use the standalone BizTalk Explorer tool instead. Sounds like I can do that.
Hi Stephen,
Yes, adding reference to any other .NET project perfectly works but not for Biztalk Projects
Error Information – Failed to add a web reference
I found this reply from other groups -‘ BizTalk doesnt support Array types’
-Regards,
I also use virtual PC for my BizTalk development projects and as Ken said I had to change the WSS settings to let IIS manage the root.
Ron Davis
Jon has lots of insight into deployment issues, but one of my favorite entries has to be this one:
http://www.masteringbiztalk.com/blogs/jon/PermaLink,guid,628aecb9-4eaa-4044-88c9-92cb53f81bdf.aspx
If you look at his grid for when you must undeploy/redeploy you can see that if you make changes to an orchestration, without changing/adding/removing ports, then its a simple matter of just deploying your fixed assembly to the GAC and recycling the biztalk service. Most of my orchestration issues center on not writing good xpath expressions, so I’m constantly changing one or two message assignment shapes and then redeploying. This trick has saved me tons of time.
Do you have WSS (Windows Sharepoint Services) Adapter installed on the virtual PC? If yes, was it installed on the root folder?
If yes, read the follg. otherwise ignore the rest:
By default, WSS adapter will try to manage the web service – You need to make a setup change to indicate that the webservice should be handled by IIS and not by WSS.This may be one of the issues…
Howver, if the Webservice resides outside the virtual PC, the above problem will not apply here.
Thanks,
KenChenue…
It is a bit more than just unenlist/stopping and restarting things.
For instance, if you have a port with map attached, you cannot redeploy the project (containing the map) without removing the map from the port. Similarly, if you have the custom pipeline attached to the map, it will be removed automagically (I think this happens if the pipeline is used by only one port) and if you redeploy the project containing pipeline, you will have to reconfigure the port properly.
I agree that these ports need not be deleted everytime the solution is (re)deployed. But, some changes are required.
The best thing is to go with binding xml files with scripts as some of the earlier posts suggested.
Thanks,
KenHi,
I am converting files from EDI to xml format. Since this was throwing errors I am just workin on the example found in htttp://www.msdn.microsoft.com/library I have followed all the steps accurately and still the error persist. It would be great if someone could post a solution for the same.
Error Message in the Even Viewer:
Error encountered: ERROR (41), interchangenr 10003 :
The sender of the document is not recognized. Contact the system administrator.
sender: [][] [7654321][ZZ][7654321], (msgnr:0 segnr:0)(line:3 pos:40 filepos:445)
Error Message from HAT:
While i run the Query under EDI Reports Recieve Messages
Error Code: 41
Error Description: The sender of the document is not recognized. please contact the System Administrator.Thanks
If I am not mistaken, rightclick on your project(not the solution) and go to properties. On the left pane go to configuration properties then to deployment. On the right pane now, set redeploy to true.
when that is done all u have to do is to unlist the project orchestrations before and checking all boxes to get rid of existing instances before deploying. U do not have to delete any ports or anything of the sort.Chenue
hi all,
can anybody please suggest me what all 10 scenarios(reasons) where i can convince myself to implement BizTalk.
cheers
vikasWe basically determined that this is either a bug or a \”design feature\”.
We will proably do a work around for now, and maybe open a support issue with Microsoft.I created a small project with 3 orchestrations to reproduce the error on demand. It is definitely related to trying to correlate on property fields that are not in the message body – i.e. SOAP Headers (and may also be tied to the use of ports with direct binding).
Neal Walters
http://Biztalk-Training.comSometimes you think you understand this stuff, then you realize you really don’t!
Given that a Correlation Type is a C# class, and a Correlation Set must be a C# object, what does \”initialize correlation\” really do? Does it basically instantiate the object? And that is why you can’t do it more than once?
Then what does following do – just change the value of the properties in the correlation set based on the current value of the promoted fields?
What can cause this message for a non-activation receive?
1. You must specify at least one already-initialized correlation for a non-activation receive that is on a non-selfcorrelating port.Why can’t you initialize correlation in a loop?
Is it like I said above, you would be reinstantiating the same object over and over? Apparently, if your loop is in a scope, you can do it.Is there anyway to initialize correlation besides doing a send or receive?
Could you do it in an expression or message assignment – I might try this later tonight?When would you select multiple correlation sets when you send a message?
What if you have 4 sends in different branches of an if statement.
You want them to all correlate on the same property field.
It looks like we either have to create four correlation sets so each one can be initialized in each branch, or we have to somehow initialize earlier, then use following in each branch.Sorry, this is the brain dump of what I have been thinking about today.
Neal Walters
http://Biztalk-Training.com – Will probably be doing a correlation video in the near future! I’ve got to get this nailed first.
