Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
R2 is officially out. It launched mid September. We had a couple guys from Microsoft in our office last week talking about the BizTalk roadmap. There definately will be another release, most likely based upon the WF instead of XLang. They said don't expect it before 2009.
Also you may find it encouraging that MS is looking to hire another Product Manager to help support the release of V.Next which they say has a scheduled release of 2009
Hi eladr,
I'm trying to get my attachments with their original file names and extensions. I'm not a programmer so could you explain how i would create the new var Microsoft.XLANGs.BaseTypes.XLANGPart type that you have mentioned?
Chris.
Yep, I think Tomas is correct.
The key is… when you do a transform inside an Orchestration the contaxt isn’t copied for you. So the 2nd line (from above) would be needed to copy all the context data over if you need it inside the 2nd message.
This is not the same behavior as mapping on the Receive Port.
Stephen W. Thomas
Branch edition exists primarily to support RFID. You would typically deploy Branch edition at a warehouse so that the RFID readers could communicate with BizTalk RFID. You would not want to purchase Branch edition unless you are working with RFID.
Yeh Greg,Nick,
I dint intend to buy it with the intention of selling it.
But I am currently stuck with loads of Freelancing Biztalk 2006 and R2 projects development.
I dont get enough the time to develop a forum website for it.
So I thoguht if this domain could help someone then I can pass it on to them.
I will develop a site when I get some free time should be by christmas.
I dint had a word with Stephen.I will talk to him this weekend.
You should create element with attribute value from your xslt result within xslt functoid . Not directly output value to element attribute.
Hi Nick,
Basically what I am trying to achieve is feeding in a batch of parameters into a custom functoid which also accepts a message string (from a config file).
The functoid then iterates through the supplied parameters and replaces any "Names" it matches with the "Value" for that paramater.
Basically I want an extended find and replace that runs from an indeterminate number of parameters.
Thanks for any ideas you may have.
Cheers
Stu.
Partial xsd:
Nick,
Actually, I seem to remember the first one copies both the message contents *and* the message context, while the second copies *only* the message context.
[quote user="DMWilkison"]First of all, 2g memory is not much. The os will use about half that.[/quote]
And what a pathetic state of affairs that is…
mchallis,
I would recommend performing this kind of splitting on a receive location rather than in an orchestration – you should be able to use the same pipeline.
This will produce 270,000 messages into the MessageBox for your 13Mb file, but BizTalk will be able to handle the load much more easily.
Hope this helps,
Nick.
ps. you've just posted a good question for a blog entry! Thanks 🙂
Stuart,
There may be a way using custom XSLT, but it'd need some research. What are you trying to acheive? there may be a better/easier solution.
Nick.
mchallis,
The first line copies the message *content* – e.g. xml. The second line copies the message content *plus* the message *context*.
Stephen W. Thomas has a quick overview here – http://geekswithblogs.net/sthomas/archive/2005/04/26/38286.aspx
Hope this helps,
Nick.
I second that comment Greg – nishil, why don't you offer it to Stephen W. Thomas (the guy who runs this site) and have it point to the BizTalk Gurus forum?
Nick.
I really hope you didn't buy this domain with the intention of making a profit from its sale. I am starting a business and I find it so frustrating when you come up with a cool business name only to find out that someone else has registered it, but aren't using it. Domain Squatting is as bad as spamming on my opinion.
