[community-content]

I’ve used a sending pipeline with a MIME encoder.

Now, I get the following error:

[code:1:335fb5ef10]Uncaught exception (see the ‘inner exception’ below) has suspended an instance of service ‘BizTalkEindwerk.Webshop(3285a6c5-a2a4-80ee-9ce2-8fc32f503e1b)’.
The service instance will remain suspended until administratively resumed or terminated.
If resumed the instance will continue from its last persisted state and may re-throw the same unexpected exception.
InstanceId: c978c591-edb6-4363-bbf1-e20ae78abab9
Shape name:
ShapeId:
Exception thrown from: segment -1, progress -1
Inner exception: Could not load file or assembly ‘Microsoft.XLANGs.StreamingSDK, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=f7896067bef0813b’ or one of its dependencies. The system cannot find the file specified.

[/code:1:335fb5ef10]

I think it has to do with my dll in the GAC that I use for the RawString

Please Reply 🙂

[community-content]

Microsoft.XLANGs.Core.Service.RootService.InstanceId.ToString()

Through this youll get the GUID of the currently running orchestration instance

Regards
NISHIL
http://biztalkblogs.com/nishil/default.aspx

[community-content]

I’m a little bit closer.

What have I been doing? I have placed the Rawstring in the GAC and create a variable from that type.

Do I need a pipeline?

[community-content]

Another two newbies questions:

I have found next article: http://geekswithblogs.net/edmundzhao/archive/2006/02/01/67832.aspx

Here is the quote I am concerned with:
[quote:12e23ac6d7]BizTalk Server 2004 is not cluster aware, therefore it is not recommended to install BizTalk 2004 on a MSCS based server cluster[/quote:12e23ac6d7]

1. What does \”being cluster aware\” actually mean?
2. Is bts 2006 \”cluster aware\”?

[community-content]

[quote:e644fbe04e=\”tomasr\”]One of the benefits of BizTalk 2006 in that it doesn’t cause so much fear of deployment is that it is not a radical architecture change from BTS04, but rather a set of very significant, but incremental, improvements to the base BTS04 architecture and feature set. [/quote:e644fbe04e]

Well, I have long experience with microsoft products and I was scared by the info that bts 2006 was scheduled to be released in November 2005 but it was released in March 27th instead. Btw, is it right, maybe I got it wrong?

[quote:e644fbe04e]
Besides, there are already several BTS06 deployments around the world (see [url]http://blogs.msdn.com/bpidcustomerresponseteam/archive/2006/03/27/562292.aspx[/url]), and is very estable, at least in my experience (and it’s so much better to work with you won’t be disappointed).
[/quote:e644fbe04e]
This is certainly encouraging. 🙂
[quote:e644fbe04e]As for the sql clustering, I’m not sure, but if SQL 2005 Standard supports clustering (I think it supports two-way clusters), I don’t know why BizTalk 2006 wouldn’t be able to take advantage of it.[/quote:e644fbe04e]
The problem was not with bts 2006 taking advantage of clustering.

My problem was I wanted to stay with bts 2004, but to still take advantage of sql server 2005 se clustering and i was not sure if there is a problem using sql server 2005 db server for hosting messageBox db from bts 2004.

Thank you for the link, I have yet to take a look there. After reading I may come back with more questions.

[community-content]

I’ve read this topic
[url]http://www.biztalkgurus.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=656&highlight=smtp[/url]

but I’m not a step further.

[community-content]

[quote:74048589c7=\”tomasr\”][quote:74048589c7=\”Fred \”]Hi,

I was wondering if anyone knows if there is a possibility of retrieving the GUID from a running Biztalk Application? Does anyone knows the lifecycle of the GUID in Biztalk?

Thanks,
Fred[/quote:74048589c7]

Fred,

I’m not quite sure what you mean here. In BizTalk 2004, there’s no clear notion of an \”Application\”, so what application are you refering to? Do you by any chance mean the Instance ID of the currently executing orchestration?

Perhaps if you tell us a little bit about what you intend to do with the GUID or what you want to use it for we can suggest some alternatives![/quote:74048589c7]

Hi Tomas,

Yes, I meant the Instance ID of the currently executing orchestration.

I plan to get the GUID and log it to the database whenever an error occurs in the orchestration.

Hope that clears things up a bit.

Thanks,
Fred

[community-content]

Are you trying to do content-based routing of messages port-to-port directly without using an orchestration? It sure sounds like it.

if so, I believe it is possible to do that in BTS06 now without having to do some tinkering with the message context in a pipeline component, but you need to configure some options when defining the send port with the SOAP adapter. See [url]http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.biztalk.general/browse_thread/thread/eba273f359e864c2/9a68a8e96115e57a[/url]

[community-content]

How does one generate a source schema with a SQL query while using the BizTalk Mapper tool?

Thank you in advance!

[community-content]

[quote:d4ceec2630=\”Fred \”]Hi,

I was wondering if anyone knows if there is a possibility of retrieving the GUID from a running Biztalk Application? Does anyone knows the lifecycle of the GUID in Biztalk?

Thanks,
Fred[/quote:d4ceec2630]

Fred,

I’m not quite sure what you mean here. In BizTalk 2004, there’s no clear notion of an \”Application\”, so what application are you refering to? Do you by any chance mean the Instance ID of the currently executing orchestration?

Perhaps if you tell us a little bit about what you intend to do with the GUID or what you want to use it for we can suggest some alternatives!

[community-content]

Thanks Greg,

I ended up writing a helper class using the XmlDocument object with SelectSingleNode…unfortunately, I had to get this working in a much narrow time frame than I had originally thought.

If you’re still curious, as I am, I can loop back and put something together within the next few days.

Again, I truly appreciate the assistance.
-Rich

[community-content]

Rich,
Can you email me your project, so I can take a look

[community-content]

Hello!

Please bare with me. I have no experience with bizTalk Server but I am in position to evaluate and recommend bizTalk Server deployment.

Having no experience with the software, I am afraid of recommending the newest version because of percieved lack of overall experience with its implementation, new features, bugs and best practices.

That is the reason I consider using the older version (2004). However, there is potential problem with bts 2004 too. Based on the requirements I need to put messageBox database on clustered database server. If I use mssql server 2000 I have to use expensive Enterprise Edition.
MSSQL Server 2005 standard edition supports clustering but I don’t know if it can be used as db server where messageBox database is placed.

Please let me know your opinion on my dilema (bts 2004 or 2006) and also if I can use mssql server 2005 with bts 2004.

[community-content]

The schema has the following property set [b:04dbcd1612]codepage=\”1200\”[/b:04dbcd1612] which is Little-Endian-UTF16.

The data being received is ASCII or UTF-8

[community-content]

It’s set to Infix

[code:1:bdf9aad782]<?xml version=\"1.0\" encoding=\"utf-16\"?>
<xs:schema xmlns:ns0=\"http://BizTalkEindwerk.Property\" xmlns:b=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/2003\" xmlns=\"http://BizTalkEindwerk.ReceiveMSMQ\" targetNamespace=\"http://BizTalkEindwerk.ReceiveMSMQ\" xmlns:xs=\"http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema\">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:appinfo>
<schemaEditorExtension:schemaInfo namespaceAlias=\"b\" extensionClass=\"Microsoft.BizTalk.FlatFileExtension.FlatFileExtension\" standardName=\"Flat File\" xmlns:schemaEditorExtension=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/2003/SchemaEditorExtensions\" />
<b:schemaInfo standard=\"Flat File\" codepage=\"1200\" default_pad_char=\" \" pad_char_type=\"char\" count_positions_by_byte=\"false\" parser_optimization=\"speed\" lookahead_depth=\"3\" suppress_empty_nodes=\"false\" generate_empty_nodes=\"true\" allow_early_termination=\"false\" early_terminate_optional_fields=\"false\" allow_message_breakup_of_infix_root=\"false\" compile_parse_tables=\"false\" root_reference=\"Root\" />
<b:imports>
<b:namespace prefix=\"ns0\" uri=\"http://BizTalkEindwerk.Property\" location=\".\\property.xsd\" />
</b:imports>
</xs:appinfo>
</xs:annotation>
<xs:element name=\"Root\">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:appinfo>
<b:recordInfo structure=\"delimited\" child_delimiter_type=\"char\" child_delimiter=\",\" child_order=\"infix\" sequence_number=\"1\" preserve_delimiter_for_empty_data=\"true\" suppress_trailing_delimiters=\"false\" />
<b:properties>
<b:property name=\"ns0:OrderNumber\" xpath=\"/*[local-name()=’Root’ and namespace-uri()=’http://BizTalkEindwerk.ReceiveMSMQ’]/*[local-name()=’OrderID’ and namespace-uri()=”]\" />
</b:properties>
</xs:appinfo>
</xs:annotation>
<xs:complexType>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:annotation>
<xs:appinfo>
<groupInfo sequence_number=\"0\" xmlns=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/2003\" />
</xs:appinfo>
</xs:annotation>
<xs:element name=\"OrderID\" type=\"xs:string\">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:appinfo>
<b:fieldInfo justification=\"left\" sequence_number=\"1\" />
</xs:appinfo>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name=\"Product\" type=\"xs:string\">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:appinfo>
<b:fieldInfo justification=\"left\" sequence_number=\"2\" />
</xs:appinfo>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name=\"Aantal\" type=\"xs:int\">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:appinfo>
<b:fieldInfo justification=\"left\" sequence_number=\"3\" />
</xs:appinfo>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:element>
</xs:schema>[/code:1:bdf9aad782]

[Author]

Posts