[community-content]

At this moment I’m up and running with a fully function 2nd attempt at MS BTX 2k6 Tutorial 1.

The problem was as described in the following link – and found via http://www.dogpile.com search engine.

http://talkaboutsoftware.com/group/microsoft.public.biztalk.general/messages/32928.html

I reopened the file in NOTEPAD, saved it, and it worked for both pipelines.
One standard and one custom.

Thanks Greg and Stephen for your time.

Phil

[community-content]

Right, but how to instruct Biztalk that one node is a CDATA node and ignore its contents?

[quote:2194b5c23a=\”nwalters\”]As far as I know there is no schema definition for CDATA. It’s just a statement in XML that temporarily turns off the well-formed-ness parser.

Neal[/quote:2194b5c23a]

[community-content]

As far as I know there is no schema definition for CDATA. It’s just a statement in XML that temporarily turns off the well-formed-ness parser.

Neal

[community-content]

And still backing up further:

<ns0:Request xmlns:ns0=\”http://EAISchemas.Request\”>
or in my case
<ns0:Request xmlns:ns0=\”http://Tut1_Schemas.T1_sch_request\”>

The parameters are defined as follows??

<ns0:<schema root node> xmlns:ns0=<Namespace>.<schema name>
(receiving schema definition)

Yes?

Thx,
Phil

I apologize for the multiple posts but struggling with getting to the right questions.

[community-content]

Hello,

i get message from pop3 adapter and trying to access the context. While accessing header information (with Email(POP3.From)) and later assignemnt to the XmlDocument I get following error:
\”The ‘@’ character, hexadecimal value 0x40, cannot be included in a name.\”

Code part in message assignment:
xFrom = System.String.Format(Email(POP3.From));

xDoc = new System.Xml.XmlDocument();
xDoc.LoadXml(\”<ns0:returnValue xmlns:ns0=’http://LeadMgmtEmail.returnValue’><return&gt;\”+Email(POP3.From)+\”</return></ns0:returnValue>\”);
conEmail = xDoc;

P.S. the conEmail is defined in a Schema, the return-tag is set to anyType.

[community-content]

The records in the schema are Positional. In the flat file there are NULL characters. Since the schema record is Positional, it will read in the characters defined in the schema positions.

This schema is migrated from BizTalk 2002. In BizTalk 2002, no error is generated by the NULL characters.

How do I modify this schema to not generate errors?

[community-content]

Greg,

I think the real, and most pertinent, question for me at this point is:

Q:
a) Why does the datafile reference the application?
b) this does not make the datafile application independent? Can you make the datafile application independant?
c) how would you configure your file/app if you wanted to get this same file to 3 different BTS applications?

Thanks for sharing your expertise.

Phil

[community-content]

Hi

I am facing a problem while creating SendPort

Error:

Could not store transport type data for Primary Transport of Send Port ‘SendPort1’ to config store. Object reference not set to an instance of an object

thanks & regards

Kiran

[community-content]

[quote:1d901f7c1f=\”Stephen W. Thomas\”]
One of the best resources are the MS Virtual Labs. Not sure if they have them for 2006 yet but the 2004 are a great place to start.
[/quote:1d901f7c1f]

There seem to be some complementary BTS06 virtual labs on the site ([url]http://msdn.microsoft.com/virtuallabs/biztalk/[/url]) in addition to the BTS2004 ones. I don’t know if they are planning on migrating the 2004 ones to 2006, though…

[community-content]

Is there really a space there that you can not see? If so and the data type is Int for example you’ll get this error. If you open the result file in note pad you might see it.

Just a guess.

[community-content]

Are you creating an instance of the Fact Retriever?

It’s set on the Policy Version. Called Fact Retriever. Also, it needs to be GACed.

Hope this helps.

[community-content]

Not real sure here.

I bet something was renamed like a root node or namespace.

If you are suing any auto generated schema or web services you might want to recreate them.

[community-content]

You might want to check out Todd’s white paper on the SQL adapter: http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnanchor/html/anch_Biztalk2004.asp

Off the top of my head I would think you could use delivery notification.

[community-content]

I’ve seen the thread pool error a lot but inside an Orchestration.

I don’t believe it’s any type of bug – it’s just .net running out of threads.

There are some KB’s that talk about how to add some threads or make changes. I never really got things to work well under load through. I usually died around 20 connections.

This might help: http://groups.msn.com/BizTalkRocks/general.msnw?action=get_message&mview=0&ID_Message=96

Otherwise, I know there are some KB’s on it.

[community-content]

The rules engines in 2006 is a lot like the one in 2004.

I think MS has a virtual lab on 2004 (http://msdn.microsoft.com/virtuallabs/biztalk/).
Oh, I just noticed they have a lab for rule in 2006 on the site – even better.

Here is a white paper covering rules in BizTalk 2004. That might help. Can probably find it via Google.

Other then that and the help docs, there isn’t much on the rules engine out there.

Best of luck.

[Author]

Posts