community-content

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 7,576 through 7,590 (of 9,652 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Scripting functoid #14088

    [quote:6e08102086=\”sash \”]
    how that array of strings can be mapped to the destination map?
    [/quote:6e08102086]

    sorry, i was wrong to call the destination schema as a map. 🙂
    Is it possible or not to map those strings from the functoid to the destination schema?

    Any suggestions will be highly appreciated

    in reply to: EDI Unlisted Document version – Translation Failed #15140

    it looks to me u r sending 4050 version, schema is 3020 version u r using, check u r GS08=003020

    GS*CG*043073964*6082744330*20051220*0604*50006*X*003020

    Nar-

    in reply to: How to debug an assembly within orchestration #14086

    Normally you can use the Debug -> Attach To Process command in Visual Studio to attach to the BTSNSvc.exe instance and debug them that way.

    in reply to: XML to Flat file via send pipeline #14071

    Hi there

    Possibly one of the best straightfoward answers ever. I have applied a map and adjusted my pipeline with the correct schema and all works perfectly.

    Many thanks for your help 🙂

    in reply to: Adding a Business RUle Reference to a Project #14083

    Hello

    I found the answer. It appears that I need to add a reference to the actual Business Rules Assembly and not the Business Rule that I have created my self. The Busness Rules Assembly can be found here.

    C:\\Program Files\\Microsoft BizTalk Server
    2004\\Microsoft.RuleEngine.dll

    Cheers
    JMan

    in reply to: Receive Location Property setting problem #15153

    As far as I know, on BizTalk 2006 you need this:

    – Copy the dll into the Pipeline Components folder in your BizTalk installation folder (as in 2004) on your development machine. This is required so that Visual Studio recognizes it and shows it on the Toolbox in the Pipeline designer

    – Deploy the dll into the GAC for real server deployment. This is the change from 2004, where it was not recommended. Instead on 2006 the recommended practice is to deploy pipeline components to the GAC for server installation.

    in reply to: flat file optional record issue #15164

    Hi,

    i created a flat file schema, every thing looks good when i validated except one issue.

    there is some records optional, i did min occurence=0, still optional logic is not working, any help is appreciated.

    thanks
    CR-

    in reply to: Multiple Stored Procedures #15158

    I need to utilize an SQL adapter to process multiple stored procedures on a single transaction.

    I have an EDI \”858 4010\” transaction from a customer which needs to be processed with ten separate stored procedures in a row. The first stored procedure inserts a record into a table in our database, and passes back an identification number (a primary key field) which is then needed to be passed into the remaining stored procedures.

    Obviously, I will need to use both kinds of SQL adapters (request and request/response).

    What is recommended and what are the best practices for a situation like this?

    Thank you in advance for your support.

    Mike

    in reply to: Receive Location Property setting problem #15154

    Hi,

    I am new to BizTalk. I have added a recv pipeline to my project. I added a rec port and when tried adding recv location I am facing a problem. I have to specify the Receive Pipeline as one of the properties.

    When I click the scrollbar, I am unable to identify my recv pipeline I have added in my pro.

    Thanks

    in reply to: EDI Unlisted Document version – Translation Failed #15146

    [quote:2f6fabc8e8=\”Anonymous\”][quote:2f6fabc8e8]Note I am not using Covast. When I use the Base EDI Adapter to pick up this instance it fails in the translation from EDI to XML phase. I keep getting the error from HAT [/quote:2f6fabc8e8]

    Note – you ARE using Covast. The base adaptor IS Covast with less schemas. I suspect 996 is not a schema they include with the base adaptor and therefore is not recognized as a loaded type by Covast.

    You might investigate the full version Covast.[/quote:2f6fabc8e8]

    The funny thing this was working with BTS 2002. I know Microsoft made things stricter with BTS 2004 but as I said the translation phase fails before it even reaches the schema.

    [quote:2f6fabc8e8=\”Anonymous\”]You might investigate the full version Covast.[/quote:2f6fabc8e8]

    We can’t – the client does not have or does not want Covast.

    in reply to: EDI Unlisted Document version – Translation Failed #15145

    [quote:60a1e046af=\”myPFerreira\”]What base schema are you using?[/quote:60a1e046af]

    I am using a 996 Schema I created with the ISA, GS, GE and IEA taken from a 850 – then I added the BGF and the K3 (just 2 segments) – all I need is 2 elements of data from it. All of which validates in Biztalk

    But the point is the [b:60a1e046af]translation fails before it reaches a Pipeline [/b:60a1e046af]so it does not even get the chance to be mapped to any schema. The translation phase happens before the mapping to a schema\” phase and I confimed this with a test with the understood 850-4010 (by undeploying the orchestrations then dropping the 850 instance) which showed a status of \”Accepted by Biztalk\” status in HAT (although I get the \”unsubscribed message\” subsequently as it cannot find a subscriber).

    [quote:60a1e046af=\”myPFerreira\”]That error you are getting is probably some \”invalid\” (for the subsystem) filed on the header of the file![/quote:60a1e046af]

    You could be right – I sawyour posting on EDI how got an unlisted schema to work. Can you spot what is wrong – here is the 996 again

    [code:1:60a1e046af]ISA*00* *00* *01*043073964 *12*6082744330 *051220*0604*U*00200*000003522*0*P*$
    GS*CG*043073964*6082744330*20051220*0604*50006*X*003020
    ST*996*500060001
    BGF*855*OQ*96243
    K3*7997100
    SE*4*500060001
    GE*1*50006
    IEA*1*000003522[/code:1:60a1e046af]

    in reply to: XML to Flat file via send pipeline #14070

    Hi

    Can someone tell me where i’m going wrong here. I have an xml file coming in, a pipeline on the send port that specifies a schema in the flat file assembler (this schema should represent the format of the file coming into the pipeline, yes?) and the send port specifying that a txt file is output to the right location. All my ports have the correct spellings of folders and are all running, everything is deployed as it should be. When I copy my xml file to my receive folder it is deleted but the flat file formatted file is not output to the send location.

    I get the following error in the HAT on my custom pipeline:

    There was a failure executing the send pipeline: \”BTSDG_FF.ff_send_pipeline\” Source: \”Flat file assembler\” Send Port: \”\\\\biztalkdev\\jodaydev$\\Chp13\\BTSDG_FF\\out\\%MessageID%.txt\” Reason: Loading document specification <BTSDG_FF.FF_xml> from assembly <BTSDG_FF, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=5af53d486044ac07> failed. Verify that the schema is deployed properly and that the schema assembly implements the document spec.
    Microsoft.BizTalk.Component.Interop.DocumentSpecException

    Have I missed something out in the process? Has anyone out there done a similar process of xml to flat file?

    Cheers

    in reply to: parsing an edi file before it reaches the ediadapter? #15041

    Yep!
    It’s a big problem getting the Subsystem to work without the covast plug-in/add-on/whatever.

    I managed to do a conversion of a D96A mesage, but it toke about a month of work! Research, testing, creating schema, etc..

    in reply to: parsing an edi file before it reaches the ediadapter? #15038

    The intention is to get you to buy the full version of Covast to get access to additional schemas. What is provided by default with the product is called the \”base EDI adaptor\” and it is meant to be lightweight. If you are really doing EDI (X12, Edifact, etc.) then you might investigate what the full version has to offer.

    in reply to: loop inside expression #14062

    You can use a regular loop shape, and use the xpath function to do what you want. You might want to take a look at Stephen W Thomas’ sample on this:
    http://geekswithblogs.com/sthomas/archive/2005/07/12/46134.aspx

Viewing 15 posts - 7,576 through 7,590 (of 9,652 total)