Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
You can use this adapter to send a trigger message to initiate your orchestration every 5 minutes.
I think BizTalk 2006 R2 comming with EDI(Hope replace Covast Adapter), may be releasing next year i guess.
Nar-
Ok, figured it out!
just edited the AssembIyinfo.cs file, and added the key file path on the [assembly: AssemblyKeyFile ……. property.
[quote user="Anonymous"]I have tried to find information about BTS 2006 and EDI. BTS 2004 was limited to a number of EDI documents in base adapter, if you needed more EDI documents you had to pay for Covast. How does it work in this version?[/quote]
It is possible to develop you own schemas for different formats!
PURU,
Try this…
CREATE OR REPLACE
PROCEDURE RET_REF_CURSOR
( p_return_cur OUT SYS_REFCURSOR)IS
BEGIN
OPEN p_return_cur FOR
SELECT * FROM emp_mast WHERE <CONDITION HERE> FOR XML AUTO, XMLDATA
END ;Nar-
Hi Nar_BTS.
My store procedure is like this..which i am not able to see in schemas.
CREATE OR REPLACE
PROCEDURE RET_REF_CURSOR
( p_return_cur OUT SYS_REFCURSOR)IS
BEGIN
OPEN p_return_cur FOR
SELECT * FROM emp_mast WHERE <CONDITION HERE>
END ;Regards.
Puru.
This will be available in the next release of BizTalk 2006. It’s called BizTalk 2006 R2.
I’m sure they will post all the details about supported hardware, etc when it gets closer to release. I think it’s scheduled for something early next year.
You can get more info directly from Microsoft on there BizTalk site.
Hope this helps.
Well, I don’t know any way to really calculate it. It all depends on all the things you just said.
I have seen BizTalk process over 900 messages per second in a lab with a whole ton of servers pushing messages. We got about 100 message / sec on the receive side and 150 message / sec on the send.
I’d take a look at how you can scale BizTalk to meet your needs based on any actual results you might have now. You also might want to look at how you can adjust BizTalk settings (like water marks, hosts, etc) to perform best for your solution.
Hope this helps.
I’m not very experienced with BAM. But I think it’s the BAM portal the needs SQL Notification Servers. What if you put the BAM portal on the SQL Server?
Just a thought.
Maybe try declaring a variable at the top of your Orchestration and set it to a default value. Then, set it inside the Catch Block on an error. See if that would works.
Thanks Mr.Nar.
I will try to do it with the help of your reply.But if you give me your own developed project with explanation,it will be very useful for me.
Thanks,
kumar
Not real sure, but I know the Oracle Adapter use parts that are not compliant with 64bit servers. Maybe the adapter is using something that’s not 64 bit compliant.
What type of adapter is it?
The adapter doesn't support UDT's. You might want to consider using a view.
Alternatively, you could use return a Ref Cursor using NativeSQL. You can find more info and samples in the Documentation.
Yes, i used a correlation type of BTS.ReceivePortName, and two loops, one for the main process (1==1), and the inner one is listening for subsequent messages (use a variable to tell if need to get the succesive msg).
And it runs like a charm, i push 10 files at the same time, and they were processed sequentially…cool
Thanks lots
No, Biztalk cannot do this out of the box.
Your best bet would be the Identity Integration Server
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserversystem/miis2003/default.mspx
