Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Great to see you back again!
Not sure on this one. Have you tried making sure you remove and then deploy? Maybe the redeploy doesn’t look at case.
Let me see if my message can be defined as "HUGE" (I really don't know what is A big message in BizTalk it is because I just started 2 mouths ago)
The message structure is about 20 records, and in each record there are 10 fields.
And for the "a LOT" of them? The answer is YES. It's an end of day check list (about few hundred, once a day); to make sure all the messages was passing thru.
Thank you for your answers.
Bizon
Check out this article on the Microsoft site. I believe it will solve your problem.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/923650
good luck.
Arnulfo Wing
Software Janitor, 😀
Configure your orchestration's send port as a direct-bound port, so that it publishes your message to the MessageBox directly and so triggers the subscriptions from any matching sendports. That way you can just add the appropriate filter expression to each sendport and enlist them.
This should accomplish what you want.
[quote user="trayburn"]
If you're trying to assign the GUID to a message and need it as a string, simply create an Orchestration variable before hand, assign the .ToString() to that, and then use the variable in the Message Assignment shape.
[/quote]
Sorry for not reporting back. That was exaccly what I had to do. Eventhoug I had the .ToString() method in my "origin" it woud fail! I had to make a copy of it to a variable, and then use the xxx.ToString() method to set the value to a promoted field! I don't understanf the need of an intermediary variable, but it's now working.
Thks anyway.I’m not a huge SQL Adapter expert. I’d guess no.
If you are looking for a more preferment solution you could look at using a simple .net component inside an Orchestration. You’d have more control over the transactions.
Well, if you have to map the data anyway this is minimal performance impact.
If you are mapping only to trip the fields, it a hit but this solution is much easer than build a custom streaming pipeline component to accomplish the task.
Unless you have “HUGE” messages or a “LOT” of them you should be fine.
Huge and Lot or of course relative to your solution and hardware J
Have you tried to validate your Xml string against the Schema?
I’d save your string as an Xml file and make sure it validates.
That’s the first thing I can think of with that error…
Thank you very much Stephen.
I have done something similar to your suggestion on Sunday.
I build a FF schema with one field node but I done this node as a positional and set it to start from 1 to 100.
In the map, I concatenate all the fields from incoming schema with coma fore delimiter and I connect it to the one field in the FF schema.
Work perfect.
I have another question: How is the performance of this solution?
Thanx
Maybe the timeout on there side is set lower than the local system you are testing with?
If I remember right, that error is common when you have a timeout.
You could do something like this inside the map, assuming you have all your data in one field. You could concatenate all the fields together and map them forward into a single node on the output side. Then just use the Trim functoid.
