Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
I got it working. You nudges and good questions got me on the right track.
That Instance XPath property was the key to getting the right syntax in the xpath query. My final query looked like this if anyone is interested.
AddNoteRequest.text = xpath(WachNewAccount,"string(/*[local-name()='Header']/*[local-name()='AccountNew']/*[local-name()='NoteNew'][" + counterStr + "]/@*[local-name()='Narrative'])");
Thanks!
Your Webserivce may be returning you this response.So its better to debug your webservice.
Or after consuming the web response you might be constructing a new message where in you need to check tht.
Hi A&M,
Thanks for the reply. I did try it out and its working fine. However I even tried and was successful when I set a property (Recoverable Interachange Processing) for the Receive pipeline. It also worked. The difference between that approach and the one you suggested is that in the former the valid records of the input batch file were getting processed and being passed to the output. But in the latter the entire file was blocked (irresp of valid and invalid records).
Thanks
AH
Hi, there
It looks like you build somewhere new message and you send it without assign or map it to the origiinal message .
AM & IT
December 10, 2006 at 7:50 AM in reply to: A question about biztalk. what is "Main" of biztalk looks like? #16820Ok..actually i understand it all.. but 🙂
If You were asked " Hi Amit, what is >>>"static void Main (string [] args )" <<< looks like and where it sits ? is there such thing at all ?
an entrance point of biztalk application? RecieveShape ? Reciveport? cause I can accepts and send messages through code.. what is the "heart" of process? CLR as I know – is only an engine.. am I right?
December 10, 2006 at 7:36 AM in reply to: A question about biztalk. what is "Main" of biztalk looks like? #16819No,
There is way to send message direct to BiZtalk from code . you have to serach in msdn ..
other ways.. you can expose it as WebService …. (many ways to do it )
December 10, 2006 at 6:50 AM in reply to: A question about biztalk. what is "Main" of biztalk looks like? #16818I"ll try:
If i have for an example code written in C#.. – console program which add a and b – a + b;
this console programm must have a " void main" else – it will be a class withno main in it rigth?
So, if i make an orchestration with recieve port, recieve shape expression shape which adds a and b, and a send shape with send port .. what i can call to in my orchestration "void main?"
as i understand – any shape in biztalk is similar to class and pipeline or map is like a method – right?
and thanx again
December 10, 2006 at 6:39 AM in reply to: A question about biztalk. what is "Main" of biztalk looks like? #16817please be more specific ?
December 10, 2006 at 6:36 AM in reply to: A question about biztalk. what is "Main" of biztalk looks like? #16816Wow .. Fast Answer! but.. actually i'd like to know "what is the entrance point of that – lets say orchestration. if any shape is just a class, where the orchestration "Comes to live"? is this connected to G A C & *.DLL's of my application?
December 10, 2006 at 6:23 AM in reply to: A question about biztalk. what is "Main" of biztalk looks like? #16815Hi there ,
"Main" as you call it can be any orchestration that has port to the out world ,
later it can be connected to any kind of recieve port.
You do it with Recieve shape and it set as active ,
after compile and deploing it you connect it with any predifined recieve port (which has recoieve location)
Amit
Nishil I am trying to post messages but i dont see them It tells me the moderator has to approve my messges. Any idea, and Nishil can u plz show me an example of how that draining works.
Thanks,
JessicaHi Stephen,
Thanks for the reply, I am not still sure how that entire while loop listen shape etc work. I tried reading in your article but I could not understand it completely.
Thanx,
JessicaStable,
Can you email me your two schemas, map and an example flat file
The only think I can suggest is to check out the Far Point Adapter: http://www.fpoint.com/biztalk/
No real way to prevent zombies. Just ways to minimize them… I’ve seen that higher timeouts seem to bring fewer zombies. So something like 60 seconds vs 5 might be better off – but I’m guessing you have a reason for the 5 second timeout.
Any way to make the process very long running so the Orchestration never ends? It would just run forever processing messages. This works in some scenarios.
-
AuthorPosts