Assembly.Load, Version Numbers and Unsigned Assemblies

Never assume anything, test everything

All these years I assumed that Assembly.Load() would respect version numbers if specified in the FullName string.   As I’ve been adding more test coverage to Microsoft.Activities I found that Assembly.Load does not work that way.

Suppose you have an assembly named ActivityLibrary and you deploy V1 but you try to load V2

// This call will succeed and happily load V1 if it finds ActivityLibrary.dll
Assembly.Load("ActivityLibrary, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null");

To force Assembly.Load to respect the version number you must sign the assembly

// Try to load V2 this call will fail if it cannot find V2
Assembly.Load("ActivityLibrary, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=824701d2ab05d638");

So be careful out there and sign your assemblies.

VS 2010 SP1 and SQL CE

VS 2010 SP1 and SQL CE

Last month we released the Beta of VS 2010 Service Pack 1 (SP1).  You can learn more about the VS 2010 SP1 Beta from Jason Zander’s two blog posts about it, and from Scott Hanselman’s blog post that covers some of the new capabilities enabled with it.   You can download and install the VS 2010 SP1 Beta here.

Last week I blogged about the new Visual Studio support for IIS Express that we are adding with VS 2010 SP1. In today’s post I’m going to talk about the new VS 2010 SP1 tooling support for SQL CE, and walkthrough some of the cool scenarios it enables. 

SQL CE – What is it and why should you care?

SQL CE is a free, embedded, database engine that enables easy database storage.

No Database Installation Required

SQL CE does not require you to run a setup or install a database server in order to use it.  You can simply copy the SQL CE binaries into the \bin directory of your ASP.NET application, and then your web application can use it as a database engine.  No setup or extra security permissions are required for it to run. You do not need to have an administrator account on the machine. Just copy your web application onto any server and it will work. This is true even of medium-trust applications running in a web hosting environment.

SQL CE runs in-memory within your ASP.NET application and will start-up when you first access a SQL CE database, and will automatically shutdown when your application is unloaded.  SQL CE databases are stored as files that live within the \App_Data folder of your ASP.NET Applications.

Works with Existing Data APIs

SQL CE 4 works with existing .NET-based data APIs, and supports a SQL Server compatible query syntax.  This means you can use existing data APIs like ADO.NET, as well as use higher-level ORMs like Entity Framework and NHibernate with SQL CE.  This enables you to use the same data programming skills and data APIs you know today.

Supports Development, Testing and Production Scenarios

SQL CE can be used for development scenarios, testing scenarios, and light production usage scenarios.  With the SQL CE 4 release we’ve done the engineering work to ensure that SQL CE won’t crash or deadlock when used in a multi-threaded server scenario (like ASP.NET).  This is a big change from previous releases of SQL CE – which were designed for client-only scenarios and which explicitly blocked running in web-server environments.  Starting with SQL CE 4 you can use it in a web-server as well.

There are no license restrictions with SQL CE.  It is also totally free.

Easy Migration to SQL Server

SQL CE is an embedded database – which makes it ideal for development, testing, and light-usage scenarios.  For high-volume sites and applications you’ll probably want to migrate your database to use SQL Server Express (which is free), SQL Server or SQL Azure.  These servers enable much better scalability, more development features (including features like Stored Procedures – which aren’t supported with SQL CE), as well as more advanced data management capabilities.

We’ll ship migration tools that enable you to optionally take SQL CE databases and easily upgrade them to use SQL Server Express, SQL Server, or SQL Azure.  You will not need to change your code when upgrading a SQL CE database to SQL Server or SQL Azure.  Our goal is to enable you to be able to simply change the database connection string in your web.config file and have your application just work.

New Tooling Support for SQL CE in VS 2010 SP1

VS 2010 SP1 includes much improved tooling support for SQL CE, and adds support for using SQL CE within ASP.NET projects for the first time.  With VS 2010 SP1 you can now:

  • Create new SQL CE Databases
  • Edit and Modify SQL CE Database Schema and Indexes
  • Populate SQL CE Databases within Data
  • Use the Entity Framework (EF) designer to create model layers against SQL CE databases
  • Use EF Code First to define model layers in code, then create a SQL CE database from them, and optionally edit the DB with VS
  • Deploy SQL CE databases to remote servers using Web Deploy and optionally convert them to full SQL Server databases

You can take advantage of all of the above features from within both ASP.NET Web Forms and ASP.NET MVC based projects.

Download

You can enable SQL CE tooling support within VS 2010 by first installing VS 2010 SP1 (beta).

Once SP1 is installed, you’ll also then need to install the SQL CE Tools for Visual Studio download.  This is a separate download that enables the SQL CE tooling support for VS 2010 SP1.

Walkthrough of Two Scenarios

In this blog post I’m going to walkthrough how you can take advantage of SQL CE and VS 2010 SP1 using both an ASP.NET Web Forms and an ASP.NET MVC based application. Specifically, we’ll walkthrough:

  • How to create a SQL CE database using VS 2010 SP1, then use the EF4 visual designers in Visual Studio to construct a model layer from it, and then display and edit the data using an ASP.NET GridView control.
  • How to use an EF Code First approach to define a model layer using POCO classes and then have EF Code-First “auto-create” a SQL CE database for us based on our model classes.  We’ll then look at how we can use the new VS 2010 SP1 support for SQL CE to inspect the database that was created, populate it with data, and later make schema changes to it.  We’ll do all this within the context of an ASP.NET MVC based application.

You can follow the two walkthroughs below on your own machine by installing VS 2010 SP1 (beta) and then installing the SQL CE Tools for Visual Studio download (which is a separate download that enables SQL CE tooling support for VS 2010 SP1).

Walkthrough 1: Create a SQL CE Database, Create EF Model Classes, Edit the Data with a GridView

This first walkthrough will demonstrate how to create and define a SQL CE database within an ASP.NET Web Form application.  We’ll then build an EF model layer for it and use that model layer to enable data editing scenarios with an <asp:GridView> control.

Step 1: Create a new ASP.NET Web Forms Project

We’ll begin by using the File->New Project menu command within Visual Studio to create a new ASP.NET Web Forms project.  We’ll use the “ASP.NET Web Application” project template option so that it has a default UI skin implemented:

image

Step 2: Create a SQL CE Database

Right click on the “App_Data” folder within the created project and choose the “Add->New Item” menu command:

image

This will bring up the “Add Item” dialog box.  Select the “SQL Server Compact 4.0 Local Database” item (new in VS 2010 SP1) and name the database file to create “Store.sdf”:

image

Note that SQL CE database files have a .sdf filename extension. Place them within the /App_Data folder of your ASP.NET application to enable easy deployment.

When we clicked the “Add” button above a Store.sdf file was added to our project:

image

Step 3: Adding a “Products” Table

Double-clicking the “Store.sdf” database file will open it up within the Server Explorer tab.  Since it is a new database there are no tables within it:

image

Right click on the “Tables” icon and choose the “Create Table” menu command to create a new database table.  We’ll name the new table “Products” and add 4 columns to it.  We’ll mark the first column as a primary key (and make it an identify column so that its value will automatically increment with each new row):

image

When we click “ok” our new Products table will be created in the SQL CE database.

Step 4: Populate with Data

Once our Products table is created it will show up within the Server Explorer.  We can right-click it and choose the “Show Table Data” menu command to edit its data:

image

Let’s add a few sample rows of data to it:

image

Step 5: Create an EF Model Layer

We have a SQL CE database with some data in it – let’s now create an EF Model Layer that will provide a way for us to easily query and update data within it.

Let’s right-click on our project and choose the “Add->New Item” menu command.  This will bring up the “Add New Item” dialog – select the “ADO.NET Entity Data Model” item within it and name it “Store.edmx”

image

This will add a new Store.edmx item to our solution explorer and launch a wizard that allows us to quickly create an EF model:

image

Select the “Generate From Database” option above and click next.  Choose to use the Store.sdf SQL CE database we just created and then click next again. 

The wizard will then ask you what database objects you want to import into your model.  Let’s choose to import the “Products” table we created earlier:

image

When we click the “Finish” button Visual Studio will open up the EF designer.  It will have a Product entity already on it that maps to the “Products” table within our SQL CE database:

image

The VS 2010 SP1 EF designer works exactly the same with SQL CE as it does already with SQL Server and SQL Express.  The Product entity above will be persisted as a class (called “Product”) that we can programmatically work against within our ASP.NET application.

Step 6: Compile the Project

Before using your model layer you’ll need to build your project.  Do a Ctrl+Shift+B to compile the project, or use the Build->Build Solution menu command.

Step 7: Create a Page that Uses our EF Model Layer

Let’s now create a simple ASP.NET Web Form that contains a GridView control that we can use to display and edit the our Products data (via the EF Model Layer we just created).

Right-click on the project and choose the Add->New Item command.  Select the “Web Form from Master Page” item template, and name the page you create “Products.aspx”.  Base the master page on the “Site.Master” template that is in the root of the project.

Add an <h2>Products</h2> heading the new Page, and add an <asp:gridview> control within it:

image

Then click the “Design” tab to switch into design-view. Select the GridView control, and then click the top-right corner to display the GridView’s “Smart Tasks” UI:

image

Choose the “New data source” drop down option above.  This will bring up the below dialog which allows you to pick your Data Source type:

image

Select the “Entity” data source option – which will allow us to easily connect our GridView to the EF model layer we created earlier.  This will bring up another dialog that allows us to pick our model layer:

image

Select the “StoreEntities” option in the dropdown – which is the EF model layer we created earlier.  Then click next – which will allow us to pick which entity within it we want to bind to:

image

Select the “Products” entity in the above dialog – which indicates that we want to bind against the “Product” entity class we defined earlier.  Then click the “Enable automatic updates” checkbox to ensure that we can both query and update Products.  When you click “Finish” VS will wire-up an <asp:EntityDataSource> to your <asp:GridView> control:

image

The last two steps we’ll do will be to click the “Enable Editing” checkbox on the Grid (which will cause the Grid to display an “Edit” link on each row) and (optionally) use the Auto Format dialog to pick a UI template for the Grid.

Step 8: Run the Application

Let’s now run our application and browse to the /Products.aspx page that contains our GridView.  When we do so we’ll see a Grid UI of the Products within our SQL CE database. Clicking the “Edit” link for any of the rows will allow us to edit their values:

image

When we click “Update” the GridView will post back the values, persist them through our EF Model Layer, and ultimately save them within our SQL CE database.

Learn More about using EF with ASP.NET Web Forms

Read this tutorial series on the http://asp.net site to learn more about how to use EF with ASP.NET Web Forms. 

The tutorial series uses SQL Express as the database – but the nice thing is that all of the same steps/concepts can also now also be done with SQL CE.  

Walkthrough 2: Using EF Code-First with SQL CE and ASP.NET MVC 3

We used a database-first approach with the sample above – where we first created the database, and then used the EF designer to create model classes from the database. 

In addition to supporting a designer-based development workflow, EF also enables a more code-centric option which we call “code first development”.  Code-First Development enables a pretty sweet development workflow.  It enables you to:

  • Define your model objects by simply writing “plain old classes” with no base classes or visual designer required
  • Use a “convention over configuration” approach that enables database persistence without explicitly configuring anything
  • Optionally override the convention-based persistence and use a fluent code API to fully customize the persistence mapping
  • Optionally auto-create a database based on the model classes you define – allowing you to start from code first

I’ve done several blog posts about EF Code First in the past – I really think it is great.  The good news is that it also works very well with SQL CE.

The combination of SQL CE, EF Code First, and the new VS tooling support for SQL CE, enables a pretty nice workflow.  Below is a simple example of how you can use them to build a simple ASP.NET MVC 3 application.

Step 1: Create a new ASP.NET MVC 3 Project

We’ll begin by using the File->New Project menu command within Visual Studio to create a new ASP.NET MVC 3 project.  We’ll use the “Internet Project” template so that it has a default UI skin implemented:

image

Step 2: Use NuGet to Install EFCodeFirst

Next we’ll use the NuGet package manager (automatically installed by ASP.NET MVC 3) to add the EFCodeFirst library to our project.  We’ll use the Package Manager command shell to do this.  Bring up the package manager console within Visual Studio by selecting the View->Other Windows->Package Manager Console menu command.  Then type:

install-package EFCodeFirst

within the package manager console to download the EFCodeFirst library and have it be added to our project:

image

When we enter the above command, the EFCodeFirst library will be downloaded and added to our application:

image

Step 3: Build Some Model Classes

Using a “code first” based development workflow, we will create our model classes first (even before we have a database).  We create these model classes by writing code.

For this sample, we will right click on the “Models” folder of our project and add the below three classes to our project:

image

The “Dinner” and “RSVP” model classes above are “plain old CLR objects” (aka POCO).  They do not need to derive from any base classes or implement any interfaces, and the properties they expose are standard .NET data-types.  No data persistence attributes or data code has been added to them.  

The “NerdDinners” class derives from the DbContext class (which is supplied by EFCodeFirst) and handles the retrieval/persistence of our Dinner and RSVP instances from a database.

Step 4: Listing Dinners

We’ve written all of the code necessary to implement our model layer for this simple project. 

Let’s now expose and implement the URL: /Dinners/Upcoming within our project.  We’ll use it to list upcoming dinners that happen in the future.

We’ll do this by right-clicking on our “Controllers” folder and select the “Add->Controller” menu command.  We’ll name the Controller we want to create “DinnersController”.  We’ll then implement an “Upcoming” action method within it that lists upcoming dinners using our model layer above.  We will use a LINQ query to retrieve the data and pass it to a View to render with the code below:

image

We’ll then right-click within our Upcoming method and choose the “Add-View” menu command to create an “Upcoming” view template that displays our dinners.  We’ll use the “empty” template option within the “Add View” dialog and write the below view template using Razor:

image

Step 4: Configure our Project to use a SQL CE Database

We have finished writing all of our code – our last step will be to configure a database connection-string to use.

We will point our NerdDinners model class to a SQL CE database by adding the below <connectionString> to the web.config file at the top of our project:

image

EF Code First uses a default convention where context classes will look for a connection-string that matches the DbContext class name.  Because we created a “NerdDinners” class earlier, we’ve also named our connectionstring “NerdDinners”.  Above we are configuring our connection-string to use SQL CE as the database, and telling it that our SQL CE database file will live within the \App_Data directory of our ASP.NET project.

Step 5: Running our Application

Now that we’ve built our application, let’s run it!

We’ll browse to the /Dinners/Upcoming URL – doing so will display an empty list of upcoming dinners:

image

You might ask – but where did it query to get the dinners from? We didn’t explicitly create a database?!?

One of the cool features that EF Code-First supports is the ability to automatically create a database (based on the schema of our model classes) when the database we point it at doesn’t exist.  Above we configured  EF Code-First to point at a SQL CE database in the \App_Data\ directory of our project.  When we ran our application, EF Code-First saw that the SQL CE database didn’t exist and automatically created it for us.

Step 6: Using VS 2010 SP1 to Explore our newly created SQL CE Database

Click the “Show all Files” icon within the Solution Explorer and you’ll see the “NerdDinners.sdf” SQL CE database file that was automatically created for us by EF code-first within the \App_Data\ folder:

image

We can optionally right-click on the file and “Include in Project" to add it to our solution:

image

We can also double-click the file (regardless of whether it is added to the project) and VS 2010 SP1 will open it as a database we can edit within the “Server Explorer” tab of the IDE.

Below is the view we get when we double-click our NerdDinners.sdf SQL CE file.  We can drill in to see the schema of the Dinners and RSVPs tables in the tree explorer. 

Notice how two tables – Dinners and RSVPs – were automatically created for us within our SQL CE database.  This was done by EF Code First when we accessed the NerdDinners class by running our application above:

image

We can right-click on a Table and use the “Show Table Data” command to enter some upcoming dinners in our database:

image

We’ll use the built-in editor that VS 2010 SP1 supports to populate our table data below:

image

And now when we hit “refresh” on the /Dinners/Upcoming URL within our browser we’ll see some upcoming dinners show up:

image

Step 7: Changing our Model and Database Schema

Let’s now modify the schema of our model layer and database, and walkthrough one way that the new VS 2010 SP1 Tooling support for SQL CE can make this easier. 

With EF Code-First you typically start making database changes by modifying the model classes.  For example, let’s add an additional string property called “UrlLink” to our “Dinner” class.  We’ll use this to point to a link for more information about the event: image

Now when we re-run our project, and visit the /Dinners/Upcoming URL we’ll see an error thrown:

image

We are seeing this error because EF Code-First automatically created our database, and by default when it does this it adds a table that helps tracks whether the schema of our database is in sync with our model classes.  EF Code-First helpfully throws an error when they become out of sync – making it easier to track down issues at development time that you might otherwise only find (via obscure errors) at runtime.  Note that if you do not want this feature you can turn it off by changing the default conventions of your DbContext class (in this case our NerdDinners class) to not track the schema version.

Our model classes and database schema are out of sync in the above example – so how do we fix this?  There are two approaches you can use today:

  • Delete the database and have EF Code First automatically re-create the database based on the new model class schema (losing the data within the existing DB)
  • Modify the schema of the existing database to make it in sync with the model classes (keeping/migrating the data within the existing DB)

There are a couple of ways you can do the second approach above.  Below I’m going to show how you can take advantage of the new VS 2010 SP1 Tooling support for SQL CE to use a database schema tool to modify our database structure.  We are also going to be supporting a “migrations” feature with EF in the future that will allow you to automate/script database schema migrations programmatically.

Step 8: Modify our SQL CE Database Schema using VS 2010 SP1

The new SQL CE Tooling support within VS 2010 SP1 makes it easy to modify the schema of our existing SQL CE database.  To do this we’ll right-click on our “Dinners” table and choose the “Edit Table Schema” command:

image

This will bring up the below “Edit Table” dialog.  We can rename, change or delete any of the existing columns in our table, or click at the bottom of the column listing and type to add a new column.  Below I’ve added a new “UrlLink” column of type “nvarchar” (since our property is a string):

image

When we click ok our database will be updated to have the new column and our schema will now match our model classes.

Because we are manually modifying our database schema, there is one additional step we need to take to let EF Code-First know that the database schema is in sync with our model classes.  As i mentioned earlier, when a database is automatically created by EF Code-First it adds a “EdmMetadata” table to the database to track schema versions (and hash our model classes against them to detect mismatches between our model classes and the database schema):

image

Since we are manually updating and maintaining our database schema, we don’t need this table – and can just delete it:

image

This will leave us with just the two tables that correspond to our model classes:

image

And now when we re-run our /Dinners/Upcoming URL it will display the dinners correctly:

image

One last touch we could do would be to update our view to check for the new UrlLink property and render a <a> link to it if an event has one:

image

And now when we refresh our /Dinners/Upcoming we will see hyperlinks for the events that have a UrlLink stored in the database:

image

Summary

SQL CE provides a free, embedded, database engine that you can use to easily enable database storage.  With SQL CE 4 you can now take advantage of it within ASP.NET projects and applications (both Web Forms and MVC).

VS 2010 SP1 provides tooling support that enables you to easily create, edit and modify SQL CE databases – as well as use the standard EF designer against them.  This allows you to re-use your existing skills and data knowledge while taking advantage of an embedded database option.  This is useful both for small applications (where you don’t need the scalability of a full SQL Server), as well as for development and testing scenarios – where you want to be able to rapidly develop/test your application without having a full database instance. 

SQL CE makes it easy to later migrate your data to a full SQL Server or SQL Azure instance if you want to – without having to change any code in your application.  All we would need to change in the above two scenarios is the <connectionString> value within the web.config file in order to have our code run against a full SQL Server.  This provides the flexibility to scale up your application starting from a small embedded database solution as needed.

Hope this helps,

Scott

P.S. In addition to blogging, I am also now using Twitter for quick updates and to share links. Follow me at: twitter.com/scottgu

New Paper on Integrating SQL Server Integration Services with StreamInsight

New Paper on Integrating SQL Server Integration Services with StreamInsight

A paper was released today which outlines some scenarios for combining SSIS with StreamInsight.  In essence, they are trying to show the value of using a streaming, time-oriented engine alongside a data transformation and quality engine. They specifically call out two patterns: embedding StreamInsight within SSIS and embedding SSIS within StreamInsight.  The background discussion is […]

BIA – The BizTalk Intelligence Agency

Lex Hegt has been owner of blog called BIA – The BizTalk Intelligence Agency and it has been around since 2005. In past Randal was contributor in the past of this blog, now I and Charles are new contributors. It is sponsored by integration team of Ordina my current employer. I encourage you to visit this site as well as it contains valuable information. It can have some overlap with this blog or one by Charles. I regularly will post here and on that blog.

Cheers!

Technorati: biztalk server 2010

Kayxo BizTalk Exchange Adapter Tips

Kayxo BizTalk Exchange Adapter Tips

Introduction I have been working on an effort to add some automation around processing of emails. In the past I have worked with the built-in POP3 adapter and also the N Software mail adapters found here: https://www.nsoftware.com/products/biztalk/adapters/emails.aspx. The built-in BizTalk mail adapters are not secure because POP3 and SMTP send cleartext passwords. In organizations that […]

WF4 Versioning Spike: IIS Hosted Workflow Services

In my previous post, I’ve been exploring how changing the version of an ActivityLibrary affects a workflow.  In this post I want to explore how Workflow Services behave.

The good news – as far as I can tell, they behave exactly as they should behave loading the assembly version they were built with. 

For this test I have a Workflow Service that uses an activity from ActivityLibrary1 and we will run through a similar set of scenarios deploying a Workflow Service (.xamlx) to a web site hosted in IIS.

Scenario 1: Baseline 
Host (IIS) Workflow Service V1, Activity (Bin V1)

Expected: Workflow Service will load Activity V1 from Bin directory

Assembly Version Path
XamlAssemblyResolutionWeb 1.0.0.0 C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v4.0.30319\Temporary ASP.NET Files\root\8950055e\173b0e0e\assembly\dl3\f71eb821\4409cc42_f2b0cb01\XamlAssemblyResolutionWeb.DLL
ActivityLibrary1 1.0.0.0 C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v4.0.30319\Temporary ASP.NET Files\root\8950055e\173b0e0e\assembly\dl3\d859493c\625d8742_f2b0cb01\ActivityLibrary1.DLL

Scenario 2: Activity in GAC 
Host (IIS) Workflow Service V1, Activity (GAC V1)

Expected: Workflow Service will load Activity V1 from GAC

Assembly Version Path
XamlAssemblyResolutionWeb 1.0.0.0 C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v4.0.30319\Temporary ASP.NET Files\root\8950055e\173b0e0e\assembly\dl3\f71eb821\c80c6811_f6b0cb01\XamlAssemblyResolutionWeb.DLL
ActivityLibrary1 1.0.0.0 C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.Net\assembly\GAC_MSIL\ActivityLibrary1\v4.0_1.0.0.0__c18b97d2d48a43ab\ActivityLibrary1.dll

 

Scenario 3: Upgrade Activity to V2 deploy to bin 
Host (IIS) Workflow Service V1, Activity (Bin V2)

Expected: Workflow Service will fail with exception because it cannot load Activity V1

Actual: System.IO.FileLoadException: Could not load file or assembly ‘ActivityLibrary1, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=c18b97d2d48a43ab’ or one of its dependencies. The located assembly’s manifest definition does not match the assembly reference. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80131040)

Scenario 4: Upgrade Activity to V2 deploy to GAC side by side with V1
Host (IIS) Workflow Service V1, Activity V2, Deploy (Bin V2) (GAC V1, V2)

Expected: Workflow Service will load activity V1 from GAC

Assembly Version Path
XamlAssemblyResolutionWeb 1.0.0.0 C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v4.0.30319\Temporary ASP.NET Files\root\8950055e\173b0e0e\assembly\dl3\f71eb821\46453429_f8b0cb01\XamlAssemblyResolutionWeb.DLL
ActivityLibrary1 1.0.0.0 C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.Net\assembly\GAC_MSIL\ActivityLibrary1\v4.0_1.0.0.0__c18b97d2d48a43ab\ActivityLibrary1.dll

 

Scenario 5: Upgrade Activity to V2 deploy to GAC remove V1 from GAC
Host (IIS) Workflow Service V1, Activity (GAC V2)

Expected: Workflow Service will fail with exception because it cannot load Activity V1

Actual: Exception Could not load file or assembly ‘ActivityLibrary1, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=c18b97d2d48a43ab’ or one of its dependencies. The located assembly’s manifest definition does not match the assembly reference. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80131040)

Scenario 6: Upgrade Workflow Service and Activity but fail to deploy Activity V2
Host (IIS) Workflow Service V2, Activity (GAC V1)

Expected: Workflow Service will fail with exception because it cannot load Activity V2

Actual: System.IO.FileNotFoundException: Could not load file or assembly ‘ActivityLibrary1, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=c18b97d2d48a43ab’ or one of its dependencies. The system cannot find the file specified.

Scenario 7: Upgrade Workflow Service and Activity but fail to deploy Activity V2

Host (IIS) Workflow Service V2, Activity (GAC V1) (Bin V1)

Expected: Workflow Service will fail with exception because it cannot load Activity V2

Actual: System.IO.FileLoadException: Could not load file or assembly ‘ActivityLibrary1, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=c18b97d2d48a43ab’ or one of its dependencies. The located assembly’s manifest definition does not match the assembly reference. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80131040)

Scenario 8: Upgrade Workflow Service and Activity but fail to deploy Activity V2
Host (IIS) Workflow Service V2, Activity (GAC V1) (Bin V1)

Expected: Workflow Service will fail with exception because it cannot load Activity V2

Actual: System.IO.FileLoadException: Could not load file or assembly ‘ActivityLibrary1, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=c18b97d2d48a43ab’ or one of its dependencies. The located assembly’s manifest definition does not match the assembly reference. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80131040)

BizTalk and AppFabric Caching: Problem or Problem Solver?

In the recent edition of The BizTalker Newsletter I featured the below article.  Read the article below or join the newsletter to have it delivered to your email.  I welcome and comments. feedback, or thoughts on this subject.


Server AppFabric contains two core pieces – Hosting and Caching. Today, I’m going to focus on the Caching piece of AppFabric.
AppFabric Caching is a new offering from Microsoft as part of the Server AppFabric collection of technologies for the Application Server role inside Windows. AppFabric Caching is Microsoft’s Distributed Cache solution for on-premise, fast, in-memory, and durable object caching.

A lot of community bloggers have been blogging about the use of AppFabric Caching with BizTalk Server. A few of the best posts are:

  • Using Windows Server AppFabric Caching for Storing SSO & Configuration data by Abdul Rafay – This shows how to Cache SSO data inside BizTalk.
  • Use AppFabric Cache to cache your WCF Service response by Mikael Hakansson – This shows how to Cache WCF response messages inside BizTalk.
  • Using AppFabric Cache in BizTalk by Todd Dhaeyer – This shows how to use AppFabric to Cache reference data and even prevent double messages.

Is Server AppFabric Caching really solving problems or creating new ones?

Rather than diving too deep into AppFabric Caching, let me summarize with a list of Do’s and Don’ts.

AppFabric Rules of Thumb – Don’ts:

  • Never put anything in the Cache that MUST not be lost – it is a non-transactional cache, not a database.

  • Never install AppFabric Caching along with other server products.  It will take up all of the available resources of the server including the entire available RAM so it should only be installed on a dedicated server.

  • Avoid making a connection to the Cache Cluster with each request.  The initial connection to the Cache Cluster is more expensive than reading and writing to the Cache. 

AppFabric Rules of Thumb – Do’s:

  • Use the Cache for fast, in-memory access to serializable .Net Objects that may or may not actually be in the Cache.

  • To achieve fault tolerances in the Cache, simply add a second node to the Cache Cluster (in most cases).

  • Use the Cache to reduce the load, performance, and potentially the license costs of more expensive products like SQL Server.

  • As demand grows, add more servers to the Cache Cluster to increase the available RAM for Caching.

The guidelines seem simple enough, so what is my hold out on BizTalk and AppFabric Cache?

Using BizTalk and AppFabric together makes awesome demos and can simplify some problems like working with reference data.  The current release of AppFabric Caching is designed to run alone on its own server since it could take up all available RAM.  This would not be a good situation on a production BizTalk Server.

My main concern with AppFabric Caching is if you have a separate caching layer along with your BizTalk Server, why not just use SQL rather than the Cache? 

  • Lower Cost – AppFabric Cache is included with the Windows License but you need extra hardware to run it on its own.

  • Better Performance – AppFabric Caching would reduce the load on SQL but I would like to see better data on SQL connection vs. Cache connection costs.  Although, if the existing SQL Cluster was already reaching capacity, moving more items away from that would be a plus. 

  • Lower Latency – In my mind, reducing latency is the biggest factor for using a Cache.  Cache would reduce the latency vs. a call to the database.  I would say in most BizTalk Solutions an external call to a SQL Server would probably not be the bottle neck given other BizTalk tuning parameters.  

  • Mission Critical Data – SQL wins out here (at least for now) because it has a true transactional backend data store. 

I love all three of the AppFabric community demos shown above.  At this stage, I would be comfortable using AppFabric Cache for reference and SSO data – not so much for removing double messages unless I was OK with maybe missing one now and then (but then what’s the point?).  I would still look to leverage SQL for double message removal given the need for true transactions.  Like everything – your unique situation may vary.

In conclusion, BizTalk and AppFabric Caching can work together.  Will caching work in scenarios such as a message re-play and de-duper?  Absolutely!  But for me, given the criticality of most BizTalk installations, I would use caution on using AppFabric Caching with BizTalk at least for now.