SharePoint 2010: New Features at a glance
Came across a great MS Article that gives you the broad brush strokes of updates and
changes.
Very handy one
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sharepoint/ee518662.aspx
Enjoy!
Came across a great MS Article that gives you the broad brush strokes of updates and
changes.
Very handy one
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sharepoint/ee518662.aspx
Enjoy!
The BizTalk 2009 R2 Technology Adoption Program (TAP) is now open for enrollment.
The goal of the TAP is to get critical feedback on feature capabilities and product quality that will be used to determine when BizTalk Server 2009 R2 is ready to ship.
The TAP Benefits
Customers that join the TAP get access to a range of resources and benefits to help make this happen as follows:
Program Management
Product Training
Early Access to BizTalk Server 2009 R2 Builds
The TAP Requirements
The Program is designed to bring together the Microsoft engineering team and customer’s project team to drive a BizTalk Server 2009 R2 project into production prior to general release of the product.
We are interested in working with organizations who want to evaluate BizTalk Server 2009 R2 and commit to providing bug reports and feature feedback.
Product Use and Deployment
Project Team and Readiness
Documentation Requirements
Participants must accept and sign the following agreements that will be provided if the nomination is accepted:
How to Submit a Nomination
If your organization is interested in joining the TAP, please use the link below to complete the nomination form, you will need to be signed in with a valid Windows Live ID to see the form. You will be contacted by the Microsoft TAP program team within 2 weeks of your submission.
https://connect.microsoft.com/BizTalk/Downloads/DownloadDetails.aspx?DownloadID=22333
Questions
If you have any questions about the BizTalk Server 2009 R2 TAP program, please don’t hesitate to email us at: btssoacp@microsoft.com
Registration is now open for the SBUG meetings in January. Refer to the below link for details and registraton
Darrenhas made available a new release (v.3.2.1) of theBizTalk Documentor. It fixes some long standing issues and also some issues that came up when used with BizTalk 2009. Check it out and let us know if you run into any problems.
We are planning some re-work of this tool as well as the venerable Orchestration Profiler […]
The below setting is somewhat misunderstood:
If you are to set this setting, what is passed to the Message Box, and what is the behavior.
To simulate this, I created a send port with the following setting:
When I ran the 867 (found in the samples folder of the SDK) I got the following error message:
There was a failure executing the send pipeline: “Microsoft.BizTalk.DefaultPipelines.XMLTransmit, Microsoft.BizTalk.DefaultPipelines, Version=3.0.1.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35” Source: “XML assembler” Send Port: “EDI Drop Off” URI: “C:\Users\Administrator\Documents\Visual Studio 2008\Projects\EDI\Output\%MessageID%.xml” Reason: This Assembler cannot retrieve a document specification using this type: http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/EDI/X12/2006/InterchangeXML#X12InterchangeXml.
I could not find the schema in the BizTalk 2009 folder.
Here is the data that is created by the EDI DASM with the Preserve Interchange setting:
<ins0:X12InterchangeXml DelimiterSetSerializedData="126:13:10:42:58:-1:-1:-1:-1" xmlns:ins0="http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/EDI/X12/2006/InterchangeXML"> <ns0:ISA xmlns:ns0="http://schemas.microsoft.com/Edi/X12ServiceSchema"> <ISA01>00</ISA01> <ISA02> </ISA02> <ISA03>00</ISA03> <ISA04> </ISA04> <ISA05>ZZ</ISA05> <ISA06>7654321 </ISA06> <ISA07>ZZ</ISA07> <ISA08>1234567 </ISA08> <ISA09>991221</ISA09> <ISA10>1226</ISA10> <ISA11>U</ISA11> <ISA12>00401</ISA12> <ISA13>000000025</ISA13> <ISA14>0</ISA14> <ISA15>T</ISA15> <ISA16>:</ISA16> </ns0:ISA> <FunctionalGroup DocType="http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/EDI/X12/2006#X12_00401_864"> <ns0:GS xmlns:ns0="http://schemas.microsoft.com/Edi/X12ServiceSchema"> <GS01>TX</GS01> <GS02>01</GS02> <GS03>1234567</GS03> <GS04>19991221</GS04> <GS05>1226</GS05> <GS06>2</GS06> <GS07>X</GS07> <GS08>004010</GS08> </ns0:GS> <TransactionSet DocType="http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/EDI/X12/2006#X12_00401_864"> <ns0:X12_00401_864 xmlns:ns0="http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/EDI/X12/2006"> <ST> <ST01>864</ST01> <ST02>3313</ST02> </ST> <ns0:BMG> <BMG01>00</BMG01> </ns0:BMG> <ns0:DTM> <DTM01>001</DTM01> </ns0:DTM> <ns0:N1Loop1> <ns0:N1> <N101>001</N101> </ns0:N1> <ns0:N2> <N201>N201</N201> </ns0:N2> <ns0:N3> <N301>N301</N301> </ns0:N3> <ns0:N4> <N401>N401</N401> </ns0:N4> <ns0:REF> <REF01>01</REF01> <ns0:C040> <C04001>01</C04001> <C04002>C04002</C04002> </ns0:C040> </ns0:REF> <ns0:PER> <PER01>1A</PER01> </ns0:PER> </ns0:N1Loop1> <ns0:MITLoop1> <ns0:MIT> <MIT01>MIT01</MIT01> </ns0:MIT> <ns0:N1Loop2> <ns0:N1_2> <N101>001</N101> </ns0:N1_2> <ns0:N2_2> <N201>N201</N201> </ns0:N2_2> <ns0:N3_2> <N301>N301</N301> </ns0:N3_2> <ns0:N4_2> <N401>N401</N401> </ns0:N4_2> <ns0:REF_2> <REF01>01</REF01> <ns0:C040_2> <C04001>01</C04001> <C04002>C04002</C04002> </ns0:C040_2> </ns0:REF_2> <ns0:PER_2> <PER01>1A</PER01> </ns0:PER_2> </ns0:N1Loop2> <ns0:MSG> <MSG01>MSG01</MSG01> </ns0:MSG> </ns0:MITLoop1> <SE> <SE01>18</SE01> <SE02>3313</SE02> </SE> </ns0:X12_00401_864> </TransactionSet> <ns0:GE xmlns:ns0="http://schemas.microsoft.com/Edi/X12ServiceSchema"> <GE01>1</GE01> <GE02>2</GE02> </ns0:GE> </FunctionalGroup> <ns0:IEA xmlns:ns0="http://schemas.microsoft.com/Edi/X12ServiceSchema"> <IEA01>1</IEA01> <IEA02>000000025</IEA02> </ns0:IEA> </ins0:X12InterchangeXml>
So what can consume this message?
If you look at Preserving a Received Batched EDI Interchange, it does not explain about what happens to the document.
If you look at Sending a Preserved Batch Interchange, it will recreate the interchange based on the settings described on the page.
I asked why there is this option, to preserve interchange, getting a document that is only consumable by the EDI ASM, and was told that you can create a map that transforms all of the EDI transactions from one to another and keep the batch together, however this does not seem correct, because a map would be looking for a MessageType of http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/EDI/X12/2006#X12_00401_864, not http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/EDI/X12/2006/InterchangeXML#X12InterchangeXml
It seems that this is only for validation, or re-enveloping.
This blog post drills down on the various hosting capabilities of WCF and WF in .NET 4 and for Window Server AppFabric as introduced in in the Introduction to AppFabric blog entry.
When referring to hosting, I am discussing the features of the “application environment”, which enables execution and management of the applications.
The .NET 4 for WCF Web services one focus was on making the application easier to configure and manage. For Workflow (WF) Web services, we integrated the “application environment” with WAS (Windows Process Activation Service) so that you could deploy, execute and manage WF services.
Windows Server AppFabric extends the WAS “application environment” to provide two additional hosting capabilities, namely “Always Running” and “Scheduled Start”.
I will describe these hosting features in detail in this post, so let’s start with the improvements in .NET 4.
1) Config Based Activation (CBA):
Today when hosting web applications containing services, you need to deploy an additional “.svc” file, describing metadata and information about the services. When organizations/applications have large number of services, there is an inherit explosion of files causing a management overhead. To address this problem, we introduced the config based activation feature which allows registration of the services in the web.config files, eliminating the need for a .svc file.
How-To:
a. Add the service registration to the web.config file of your web application.
In the example below, we register two services, the CreditCheckService and the PaymentService. In addition the Payment/PaymentService.svc specifies a customfactory that can be used for activation.
<system.serviceModel>
<serviceHostingEnvironment>
<serviceActivations>
<add relativeAddress= “CreditCheckService.svc” service=“Microsoft.ServiceModel.Samples.CreditCheckService”/>
<add relativeAddress= “Payment/PaymentService.svc” service=“Microsoft.ServiceModel.Samples.PaymentCheckService” Factory=”CustomFactory”/>
</serviceActivations>
</serviceHostingEnvironment>
</system.serviceModel>
Note: You have the option of using either Service Config Editor or Visual Studio Intellisense to configure the application.
More details about this feature can be found here;
%u00b7 http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee358764(VS.100).aspx
2) Support Multiple Site Bindings:
Many hosters and organizations host their web application over multiple ports and hostnames. This makes their service accessible over multiple addresses. For example the following addresses resolve to the same service.
store.com
OR
www.store.com:80
www.store.com:90
The URLs above require specifying multiple site bindings in IIS. Lack of this support for this feature in the WCF runtime was an adoption blocker in the 3.0 release of the .NET framework. In .NET 3.5, we made some incremental improvements through baseAddressPrefixFilters. In .NET 4, we have addressed more of this feature, which has significantly eased the shared hosting deployment issues.
How-To:
a. Configure Site: Configure IIS site binding with the required host headers.
b. Enable Application: Configure the application web.config file to enable multiple site bindings. See example below.
<system.serviceModel>
<serviceHostingEnvironment multipleSiteBindingsEnabled=”true”>
<system.serviceModel>
Note: Only multiple of http/https site bindings are supported. i.e. TCP and other protocols are not currently supported
More details about this feature can be found here;
%u00b7 http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee358763(VS.100).aspx
3) Enable Extension-less URLs
There are scenarios when you might want to deploy your web service without extensions in the URL say for example, a WCF REST RSS service deployed with these URL
http:://www.store.com/products/
http://www.store.com/Movies
We leveraged System.Web.Routing feature and added a new System.ServiceModel.Activation.ServiceRoute API to enable the registration of WCF services. This enabled us to extend an API customers were already familiar with it to WCF Services.
How-To:
The example below enables activation of a WCF REST service over the URI http://www.store.com/movies
a. Enable runAllManagedModulesForAllRequests
Add the following configuration to the application web.config file. Note: the Visual Studio web application template includes this by default.
<modules runAllManagedModulesForAllRequests=“true“>
b. Register the Route Handler/Module
<add name=“UrlRoutingModule“
type=“System.Web.Routing.UrlRoutingModule,
System.Web.Routing, Version=4.0.0.0,
Culture=neutral,
PublicKeyToken=31BF3856AD364E35“ />
</modules>
<handlers>
<add name=“UrlRoutingHandler“
preCondition=“integratedMode“
verb=“*“ path=“UrlRouting.axd“
type=“System.Web.HttpForbiddenHandler,
System.Web, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral,
PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a“ />
</handlers>
c. Register the service either in global.asax or AppInitiate() method deployed to App_Code directory.
protected void Application_Start(object sender, EventArgs e)
{ RouteTable.Routes.Add(new ServiceRoute(“movies”, new WebServiceHostFactory(), typeof(Movies)));
}
More details about this feature can be found here –
%u00b7 http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee358764(VS.100).aspx
4) Workflow in WAS
As part of providing the “application environment” for WF, we enabled
1) Activation of declarative .xamlx Workflows when deploy to WAS
2) Continued execution by identifing instance performing work and reporting it to the hosting environment. This ensures that the host process is not un-necessarily recycled.
How-To:
Use the WCF workflow Service Application template to develop WF application to be hosted in WAS/Windows Server AppFabric. These templates will generate .XAMLX resources which are directly hostable in WAS.
Note: if you have custom activities which need to be deployed along with the application, then they need to reference it in the system.web.compilation <assemblies> element.
Now let’s look at the feature for Hosting that Windows Server AppFabric provides in addition to the .NET Framework.
5) Windows Server AppFabric Service Management Service
There are mainly two scenarios why we implemented the service Management Service in Dublin. They are:
A Batch processing
a. The scenario is that you want to batch process orders at off peak times or weekend. Typically this scenario is that a web application takes the order and puts it in the queue, and the orders are processed from at the end of the day when servers are typically otherwise idling.
B Support Windows Server AppFabric Workflow Management Service
b. The Workflow Management Service (WMS) is responsible for resuming “runnable” durable instances. See Introduction to AppFabric blog entry for details. This service uses the Service Management Service as a mechanism to start the WorkflowServiceHost. This is an implementation detail of the Windows Server AppFabric Workflow Management Service.
To support the above requirement there needed to be a protocol agnostic way to start a service and so we introduced the Windows Server AppFabric Service Management Service, which enables starting any service (registered with the application environment) within the application.
How-To
The first question to ask is “How do I address this service?” To demonstrate this with an example.
http://www.store.com/Services/dvd.svc/titleInfo
Above is a URI of a dvd.svc .Remember the fact that Service Management service is an independent service, which resides in every virtual application, and is capable of being activated over the named.pipe transport protocol.
It implements an IServiceManagement interface, which contains the ActivateService method, with one parameter the virtualPath.
Returning to our example, let’s say the above dvd.svc is deployed in the virtual application called “Services”.
To construct URI of the Service Management service
1) Replace the protocol the service URI with net.pipe
2) Replace the hostname with the appropriate host header specified in the site binding
3) Remove the relativeServicePath and append it rest of the path with /ServiceManagement.svc
So for this example, the Service Management Service can be specified with
net.pipe://localhost/Services/ServiceManagement.svc
Typically to start a service, you could envision a application which takes a service URI, calculates the SMS URI, and pings the application.
6) Autostart WCF/WF Services
One issue when hosting services in IIS is the “first message latency” message delay or the the requirement to “Warm-up” the application, in advance of the first message.
Autostart is a feature introduced in Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008 R2 which allows you to achieve this. It provides “Warm-up” and the “Always Running” semantics. Additionally, It removes the need to write a WAS host aware transports, otherwise known as Listener Adapters.
You should use this feature for primarily two reasons
a. Reduce the latency incurred by the first message.
b. Hosting WCF transports/protocols for which there are no Listener Adapters. The trade-off is site density
This feature is supported only on the Win7 and Win2008 R2 platform.
How-To:
Windows Server AppFabric provides configuration support in IIS Manager to Autostart the application.
1. Navigate to the Application
2. Click on Configure in Actions pane
3. Configure the Application to either by choosing
a. Enabled which will autostart all the services
or
b. Custom option, which will autostart only the specific services.
To Autostart an individual service, you will need to navigate the configuration panel for that specific service.
To summarize, we made hosting investments , in both the framework and Windows Server AppFabric, primarily focusing on the following aspects
1) Easier WCF service configuration and management
2) Enable activation and execution of Worflow in WAS
3) Enhance the existing “application environment” capabilities in WAS by providing additional semantics like “Always Running” and “Scheduled Start” for web services.
The Microsoft DevDays Netherlands 2010 show (“Dutch DevDays”) was announced today for March 30-31, 2010 in The Hague. The Website is now live, and registration open:
http://www.devdays.nl/
The big news is they lined up Anders Hejlsberg to keynote the event.
Pluralsight is planning to have a strong presence at the event again this year. We had a wonderful time at last year’s event. Hope to see you in The Hague next year!
This post is about setting up user permissions in EPiServer CMS. It is meant as a basic introduction. Part two (this post!) is about how administrators create a well-defined and natural permission…
Daniel Berg’s blog about ASP.NET, EPiServer, SharePoint, BizTalk
It gives me great pleasure to announce Version 1.0 of the BizTalk Message Archiving Pipeline Component and my new venture, Atomic-Scope.
The component allows you to archive Xml, flat-file, EDI and binary messages as they pass thru receive and send pipelines, without the need for complex ‘archiving’ Send Port configurations, additional load on the MessageBox database […]
Hello,
I updated today a new build of MBV.
With the previous one published few weeks ago, MBV brings now lot of new interesting queries and fixes (see below the complete list).
As interesting new query, MBV is parsing now your SQL Error logs for critical errors and raise corresponding warnings if found.
MBV is reporting now also the SQL agent log containg any errors if the BizTalk jobs are failing.
MBV includes also now the “tempdb” inf Db analyzed so you can see quickly in MBV report the size and files info about your temp. Knowing as important the tempdb is, it can be useful to have this info in report as well.
I added also again some new parsing rules for the Eventlog query identifying so possible know issues bases on the event source, event ID, and the event message contain.
Feel free so to use now latest version on my blog (http://blogs.technet.com/jpierauc/pages/msgboxviewer.aspx) containing these features and report me your comment or bugs found
Thanks !
JP
New Features:
– Include “Tempdb” info on the “Dbs infos”, “Dbs Files”, and “Dbs Space” queries
– Query to get list of IIS App pools with their owning Applications and check if an Application is a BizTalk Receive Location
– Query to get list of Web sites with all their propertes App pools with their owning Applications and check if an application is a BizTalk Receive Location
– Get list of active global SQL Trace flags
– Query to get the SQL agent log
– Changed the KB linked to the warning message when AllowOnlySecureRpcCalls is not set correctly on cluster
– Fixed HotFix queries to get also the 32 bits installed on a X64 machine
– Display now HotFix file(s) with their version
– Fixed the .NET config files to have also the ones from 64 bits version of the Framework
– Get also BTSNTSVC64.exe.Config if found
– Order by DESC the Most recent records in TDDSFailedTRRackingData table for both DTA and BAM dbs
– Fixed an HTML display issue (report can be expanded correctly ) when we fail to connect to some Dbs
– Added Autogrow rules for the “DBs File” query to check the current auto grow of BizTalk Dbs against our recommendations for MDF and LOG files- New query in “Server Info” category: “NET Config files” on all BT servers – not checked by default
– New query in “Server Info”: “Running Processes” on all servers
– New query in “Advanced DB Info” category: “Tracking tables Sequence Number” – not checked by default
– New query in “Advanced DB Info” category: “Tracking tables Sequence Number gaps” – not checked by default
– New query in “Advanced DB Info” category : “Tracking tables Sequence Large BLOBs” – not checked by default
– Provides a rule raising a warning if large table “NotEqualPredicateTables” found (known issue)
– Provides additional EventsLog rules
– Improves MsgBox Database naming convention in some Summary Report categories to be unique in multiple MsgBox scenarios
– Provides “Total Q rows” entry in the “MsgBox Table” Summary Report category
– “Current Error Log” query is modified to list entries in Descendant order
– Provides some rules to the “Current Error Log” query to check for Disk space errors, Db Integrity or Fatal errors, and raise warnings if found
– “Error Log.1” request in now moved into its dedicated query – not Checked by default
– Host instance “Start time” is now added in Topology Report “Running Host instance” category
– System Variables are added in Topology Report