by community-syndication | Sep 9, 2008 | BizTalk Community Blogs via Syndication
More then a few times I have seen interview questions that people post on their blogs for use when interviewing people for a BizTalk Server job opportunity. I never use interview questions. I'm not sure if the market and access to BizTalk developers…(read more)
by community-syndication | Sep 8, 2008 | BizTalk Community Blogs via Syndication
Alright, now that the New Zealand Tech Ed is done and dusted people around here are back at blogging, including me.
I thought I’d start with one that’s been on my list for a while: how to make multiple calls to the same stored procedure using the SQL Adapter without having to use a loop shape.
No […]
by community-syndication | Sep 8, 2008 | BizTalk Community Blogs via Syndication
I just got back from two weeks in Denmark and Sweden. Had a great time, met a number
of really interesting and smart people and all my host’s hospitality was just incredible!
For those of you that came to the talk I did on REST at the Stockholm BizTalk User
Group meeting – here is the code and the slides
stockholmbtug.zip
(796.71 KB)
Also – I just have to say, this group is one of the best User Groups I’ve ever spoken
at. From the travel to the talk itself it was a great experience. Thanks again!

Check out my new book on REST.
by community-syndication | Sep 8, 2008 | BizTalk Community Blogs via Syndication
In the previous post, I laid out a data visibility problem and proposed using RSSBus to build an enterprise mashup that inflates a single data entity whose attributes reside in multiple disparate systems.
Before a mashup can be built, we actually need the source data in a ready-to-mashup format. For the mashup I am building, my […]
by community-syndication | Sep 8, 2008 | BizTalk Community Blogs via Syndication
I have never been exposed to Human Workflow Services (HWS) in BizTalk Server and find it interesting that such a solid framework is available “native” to BizTalk. Yet, with almost no documentation / samples available online, and some bloggers claiming that HWS support will be discontinued, I was wondering who among you have actually had experience working with it, and what your thoughts on the framework are…
I am currently working on a Zero-touch provisioning project, and HWS could play a major role in the Human workflow requirements.
by community-syndication | Sep 8, 2008 | BizTalk Community Blogs via Syndication
Announcement
On Friday Sept. 5, Microsoft will announce features for BizTalk Server 2009 and future releases plans to provide customers and partners with further clarification about what to expect.
Details:
Below is an update on plans for BizTalk Server 2009 and provided clarity on the rhythm of future releases following BizTalk Server 2009.
The two main highlights of […]
by community-syndication | Sep 7, 2008 | BizTalk Community Blogs via Syndication
From another session Breeze jointly did with Kenetics whom supplied the hardware for
the entire TechEd 08.
It was a great session Scotty & myself did around demo-ing the bits that were
used to build the system.
by community-syndication | Sep 7, 2008 | BizTalk Community Blogs via Syndication
As promised, the chaos of TechEd has subsided and if there’s that thing of normality
approaching….we’ll I must be close to it.
My Thursday after lunch session went great with a whole series of demos about different
aspects of hosting and running workflows (WCF based, .NET 3.5, Tracking, FilePersistence,
Obtaining Metadata etc):
>
Powerpoints
WF
Demo Solution
by community-syndication | Sep 7, 2008 | BizTalk Community Blogs via Syndication
The main details folks are as follows: (from an earlier email from Corp)
Details:
1. BizTalk Server vNext:
-
Naming Change: We have also updated the name of the next release
from BizTalk Server 2006 R3 to “BizTalk Server 2009”. By calling the product
BizTalk Server 2009, we can clearly communicate this is a full product release with
new and enhanced capabilities and updated platform support for customers to take full
advantage of the latest technology wave (Windows Server 2008, Visual Studio 2008,
SQL Server 2008, .NET Framework 3.5).
-
BizTalk Server 2009 Timing: We will deliver a public CTP by
the end of this calendar year. Additionally, BizTalk Server 2009 is on track
for availability in the first half of calendar year 2009.
-
Features: We bucket the 2009 release into 5 core feature areas,
which are detailed further on the BizTalk roadmap page. These include platform support,
SOA & web services, business to business integration, device connectivity and
developer and team productivity(i.e. VSTS support 🙂
2. Future Plans:
-
Ship Rhythm: Microsoft’s commitment to maintain a rhythm of
releases roughly every 2 years.
-
High-Level Themes: We outlined priorities for the next couple
of releases. Including:
-
Developer productivity enhancements (e.g. complex mapping);
-
Enhanced B2B support (e.g. complex trading partner management, expanded industry standards
and schemas);
-
Low-latency messaging enhancements and ESB Guidance;
-
Enhanced device support for cross-enterprise asset tracking, enterprise manageability
of devices, and key industry standards;
-
Real-time business event visibility through BI / BAM Enhancements; and
-
Integration with the latest new platform capabilities (to take advantage of the latest
advances in the .NET Framework, Visual Studio, and Windows Server).
More Info:
For more information on the BizTalk Server roadmap announcement please visit the BizTalk
roadmap page.
Additional Resources
For more information go to:
%u00b7 PressPass Q & A with Oliver Sharp, GM of BizTalk Server: http://www.microsoft.com/presspass
%u00b7 BizTalk Website: http://www.microsoft.com/biztalk/
%u00b7 BizTalk Server Team Blog: http://blogs.msdn.com/biztalk_server_team_blog/
%u00b7 Steven Martin, director in the Connected Systems Division Blog: http://blogs.msdn.com/stevemar/default.aspx
by community-syndication | Sep 7, 2008 | BizTalk Community Blogs via Syndication
I’ve seen a number of posts, videos, and now a conference talk abstract talking about
Lo-REST versus Hi-REST
I thought this was already a closed issue
See Dare’s
post
There isn’t anything that is “Lo-REST”, there are services that follow the constraints
of the REST architectural style, and those that don’t (sometimes those that don’t
have a good reason not to)
Some of this seems to revolve around some clients not supporting all verbs, this is
easily fixed with the X-HTTP-Method-Override HTTP header
My next post hopefully will show how easy this is to implement using WCF extensibility.
Check out my new book on REST.