I’ve seen a number of posts, videos, and now a conference talk abstract talking about
Lo-REST versus Hi-REST
I thought this was already a closed issue
See Dare’s
post
There isn’t anything that is “Lo-REST”, there are services that follow the constraints
of the REST architectural style, and those that don’t (sometimes those that don’t
have a good reason not to)
Some of this seems to revolve around some clients not supporting all verbs, this is
easily fixed with the X-HTTP-Method-Override HTTP header
My next post hopefully will show how easy this is to implement using WCF extensibility.
Check out my new book on REST.