Unintentional debatching in rcv pipeline

Home Page › Forums › BizTalk 2004 – BizTalk 2010 › Unintentional debatching in rcv pipeline

Viewing 2 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • May 7, 2008 at 9:53 AM #19587
      community-content

         I’m receiving a csv flat-file.  It’s debatching in the pipeline, causing one orchestration to start for each row.

        Sometimes I desire such behavior, but in this case I don’t.

        I can’t figure out what is making it debatch.  The pipeline refers to two schemas, the header and document schema.

        Neither one has “Envelope=true” and thus neither had the “Body XPath” parameter set.

        Any ideas what else makes it debatch?

        Thanks,
        Neal Walters
        http://BizTalk-Training.com

         

      • May 7, 2008 at 10:43 AM #19589
        community-content

          Neal,

          You will need two schemas to handle a debatching scenario and a non-debatching scenario.

          On the schema you don’t want debatching, check that the element on which the splitting is occuring is not set to MaxOccurs = 1, you want this to read ‘unbounded’ (i.e. ‘*’)

          Rgds, Nick.

        • May 7, 2008 at 1:03 PM #19590
          community-content

            The Flat File DASM does not use the Envelope semantic to debatch a message. It uses the structure of the schemas.

            e.g if a schema has this structure

            <row><field/><field/><field/></row>

            Then the FF DASM will debatch by row.

            To receive the entire message change the schema to

            <message><row maxOccurs=”unbounded”><field/><field/><field/></row></message>

            • May 8, 2008 at 7:33 AM #19596
              community-content

                Wow!  Thanks a lot.  It’s always interesting to learn new tricks of BizTalk.

                In this case, I brought the schema forward from an old system that we are rewriting.  Had I built the schema myself, I probably would have made the group unbounded.  Apparently in the old system, they wanted to debatch.

                Neal

                 

          • Author
            Posts
          Viewing 2 reply threads
          • The forum ‘BizTalk 2004 – BizTalk 2010’ is closed to new topics and replies.