I have recently been pointed towards a help page written by Microsoft with a wealth of information regarding BizTalk Server 2013 which I was unaware of (thanks to Kundan Karma in the LinkedIn BizTalk Elite group) – http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-US/library/jj248691(v=bts.80).aspx What with all us bloggers writing about the release of BizTalk 2013 Beta I found that the […]
Blog Post by: Johann
So people, it’s happening in the UK. The BizTalk Crew (SaravanaKumar, Nino Crudele, Steef-JanWiggers, Sandro Pereira and me, TordGlad Nordahl) are presenting all new presentation in London January 16th 2013! We have all seen that BizTalk2013Beta has been released and I will focus on the new things in BizTalk 2013, Windows Server 2012 and SQL […]
Blog Post by: Tord Glad Nordahl
One of the big problems with BizTalk Server 2010 and earlier is that it isn’t possible to change which host you want your dynamic send port to run on. This is now possible in BizTalk Server 2013 and this will show you how to do it.
I will just do a very simple sample where I receive a file and send it to a hardcodet destination. In really life this might depend on the message or the content of the message or it can be something you look up in a database.
So first the orchestration:
Where the DySP port is set to have a dynamic binding. You configure the DySP port inside the Expression_1 shape like this:
Microsoft recently released the beta release of BizTalk Server 2013. The first good news is that the initial name (BizTalk 2010 R2) has changed to BizTalk 2013, indicating it will be a major release, providing longer support to our customers! The beta contains the following capabilities: Integration with Windows Azure Service Bus – these are […]
Blog Post by: DipeshA
Well it has been a while since I last posted. I have been sitting on a couple things and wanted to get this information out there. Recently I had to work on an ADFS 2.0 to 2.1 migration. There is apparently not any supported easy way to upgrade an ADFS environment to work on Windows […]
Blog Post by: clineer
Besides this blog, I still write regularly for InfoQ.com as well in as a pair of blogs for my employer, Tier 3. It’s always a fun exercise for me to figure out what content should go where, but I do my best to spread it around. Anyway, in the past couple weeks, I’ve written a […]
Blog Post by: Richard Seroter
Tellago’s Technology Updates series continues throughout November and December. We would like your input to help us prioritize some of the topics. NFC, enterprise big data, enterprise mobility, gamification? the all sound exciting. Please take 5 seconds…(read more)
Blog Post by: gsusx
In the last post BizTalk Server 2013 BETA I mentioned BizTalk Server 2013 beta will allow me install the software on a Windows 8 laptop and continue my BizTalk development, without getting stuck in the old OS. Thanks to the platform alignment in 2013. There were few comments on the blog asking whether BTS 2013 […]
The post BizTalk Server 2013 BETA–Window 8 Configuration issues appeared first on BizTalk360 Blog.
Blog Post by: Saravana Kumar
In my last mapping pattern post, I explained how and described the pros and cons of four methods to accomplish a mapping from hierarchical schema to a name value pair so the logically next step would be to describe the inverse process. When I decided to implement this mapping I really thought it would be […]
Blog Post by: Sandro Pereira
| I regularly use the following trick while writing an e-mail so that I don’t send it by error before it is fully written: | J’utilise r%u00e9guli%u00e8rement le truc suivant lorsque j’%u00e9cris des e-mails, de fa%u00e7on %u00e0 ne pas envoyer par erreur un message encore en cours de r%u00e9daction et que je n’ai pas encore relu: |
| I put a user called “attendre” (this means “wait” in French). | Je mets un utilisateur “attendre” en copie. |
| If by mistake, I press the send button before removing attendre, the e-mail doesn’t get sent because attendre does not exist, and it is not a valid address either. | Si par erreur, j’appuie sur le bouton d’envoi avant d’avoir supprim%u00e9 attendre, l’e-mail ne part pas car attendre n’existe pas, et ne correspond pas non plus %u00e0 une adresse e-mail valide. |
| I use the trick with Outlook but I suppose this would work with most e-mail clients as well. | J’utilise ce truc avec Outlook mais je suppose que cela fonctionnerait %u00e9galement avec la plupart des clients de messagerie %u00e9galement. |
Blog Post by: Benjamin GUINEBERTIERE