Hi all, the BizTalk team has been busy and now the BizTalk 2010 exam has been officially
released.

http://www.microsoft.com/learning/en/us/exam.aspx?ID=70-595

I’m going to sit it in the next few weeks and get a taste of it.

Good luck all and what a great day this is – well done Team!

Snippet..

Audience Profile

Candidates for this exam typically work as a BizTalk developer in an organization
that has a need to integrate multiple disparate systems, applications, and data as
well as the need to automate business processes by using BizTalk Server.

 

Candidates should have a solid understanding of fundamental BizTalk concepts around
the core messaging engine and building business processes using orchestrations.

 

Candidates will have some exposure to larger-scale multi-server solutions and deployment/management
familiarity. This core knowledge is required for BizTalk 2006 R2, 2009, and 2010.
In addition, core knowledge of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) and Electronic
Data Interchange (EDI) is also required.

Candidates should also have at least two years’ experience developing, deploying,
testing, troubleshooting, and debugging BizTalk Server 2006 and later solutions across
multiple projects and have experience using the Microsoft .NET Framework, XML, Microsoft
Visual Studio, Microsoft SQL Server, Web services, and WCF while developing BizTalk
integration solutions

 

Credit Toward Certification

When you pass Exam 70-595: TS: Developing Business Process and Integration Solutions
by Using Microsoft BizTalk Server 2010, you complete the requirements for the following
certification(s):

Microsoft Certified Technology Specialist (MCTS): Microsoft BizTalk Server
2010

Note This preparation guide is subject to change at any time without prior
notice and at the sole discretion of Microsoft. Microsoft exams might include adaptive
testing technology and simulation items. Microsoft does not identify the format in
which exams are presented. Please use this preparation guide to prepare for the exam,
regardless of its format.

Blog Post by: Mick Badran